Jump to content

Search results

Results 1 – 8 of 8
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  • blacklisting after all existing links have been usurped. Btw, bots have the sboverride right so even blacklisting shouldn't be an issue for that? (besides, the...
    31 KB (3,303 words) - 08:22, 24 February 2024
  • Matt Deres (talk) 02:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC) @Matt Deres bots have the sboverride user right, allowing them to bypass the spam blacklist. Victor Schmidt...
    24 KB (3,058 words) - 03:50, 10 July 2023
  • by default, phab:T313107 is about bots - and communities can also get sboverride added locally if needed (probably best to see where the default tasks...
    501 KB (62,224 words) - 22:56, 2 May 2023
  • (talk) 16:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC) How would I get User:GreenC bot the new sboverride userright? c.f. T36928 recently closed resolved. -- GreenC 20:12, 29 August...
    187 KB (24,706 words) - 18:09, 15 February 2024
  • for having an inactivity policy at all is that the bot right comes with sboverride and rateunlimiter (or whatever the name is), which Anomie alludes to below...
    87 KB (12,768 words) - 12:34, 5 June 2024
  • interest. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC) There's apparently an sboverride permission to override the blacklist. There're very few discussions about...
    199 KB (25,806 words) - 15:25, 4 April 2024
  • which applies for everyone at that point. The relevant permission is sboverride, which no group on English Wikipedia possesses. The relevant task is phab:T313106;...
    501 KB (60,338 words) - 16:21, 15 November 2023
  • @Johnuniq According to Special:ListGroupRights indeed admins don't have the sboverride right (while bots do). So it should be possible to take away the new right...
    692 KB (93,533 words) - 15:07, 28 October 2023