Search results
Appearance
- request." But in practice we need the explicit rules against synthesis by juxtaposition in WP:SYN. Without that a case like the one in the section below...503 KB (75,210 words) - 00:08, 20 April 2022
- attended", it would still be (with or without the word 'but') 'synthesis by juxtaposition' (WP:JUXT?) and hence unacceptable - the point being that we need...253 KB (39,332 words) - 16:17, 21 October 2021
- that the current version can be improved. I would like to see 'synthesis by juxtaposition' listed as a type of OR. I think that if John Doe is sourced as...290 KB (45,859 words) - 12:53, 13 April 2022
- --Coppertwig (talk) 23:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC) It's original synthesis by juxtaposition of facts. It's usually part of subtle attempt "the first kind...290 KB (42,997 words) - 16:27, 4 February 2023
- that will lead to a conclusion, without explicitly advancing it (synthesis by juxtaposition of irrelevant facts). It's best if such a thing doesn't seem "OK"...256 KB (37,155 words) - 16:27, 4 February 2023
- research/Archive 56#quote-diving Synthesis by juxtaposition 7 Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Synthesis by juxtaposition PSTS: I think you'll find...278 KB (42 words) - 03:29, 10 August 2024