Search results
Appearance
The page ""Or. L. Rev." journal" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review or request that a redirect be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- University of Oregon School of Law (redirect from Or. L. Rev.)of Law is home to several legal journals. The Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation is a student-run law journal founded in 1986 and dedicated to...25 KB (2,457 words) - 20:42, 12 July 2024
- Movements and LatCrit Community". Or. L. Rev. 81: 607–608. Noriega 2000, p. 43. McComb, Don (1990). "Introduction". Journal of Communication Inquiry. 14 (1):...7 KB (850 words) - 07:49, 25 July 2024
- Review, Winter 1995, 74 Or. L. Rev. 1209; "Contract and Fiduciary Duty", by Frank H. Easterbrook and Daniel R. Fischel, The Journal of Law and Economics...57 KB (7,225 words) - 01:09, 21 June 2024
- Warez: The No Electronic Theft Act and Criminal CopyrightInfringement, 82 Or. L. Rev. 369 (2003)". Eric Goldman. Retrieved 2019-02-23. Nicholas Ryan (1997-04-17)...51 KB (5,945 words) - 11:49, 20 May 2024
- Oregon’s judicial department. In 1922 his History of the Oregon Code (1 Or. L. Rev.) was published in the Oregon Law Review while in 1938 his A History of...5 KB (502 words) - 05:16, 3 September 2023
- Kinsport, Kit (1988). "Defending Battered Women's Self-Defense Claims". Or. L. Rev. Rev. 67: 393. Bio, Penn State College of Law Author page, SSRN.com...8 KB (631 words) - 20:46, 23 July 2024
- 41: Summers, Robert S. "A critique of the business-purpose doctrine." Or. L. Rev. 41 (1961): 38. Kappel, Frederick R. (1964). Business Purpose and Performance...9 KB (1,023 words) - 00:09, 8 October 2023
- Federal Arbitration Act and the Power of Congress over State Courts, 83 Or. L Rev 542 et seq. (2004) Drahozal, "In Defense of Southland: Re-Examining the...46 KB (6,343 words) - 03:06, 13 September 2023
- Shrinking the Commons: Termination of Copyright Licenses and Transfers for the Benefit of the PublicSee Jessica Litman, Copyright Legislation and Technological Change, 68 Or. L. Rev. 27, 357 (1989) (“Every proposal to change the status quo has received