User talk:Daniel
RelistsHi Daniel, It's really good to see you active! I've seen a couple of your relists where you imply that an article needs to be improved before the discussion can be closed as 'keep' (" Relisting to allow the improvements promised in the above discussion to materialise." and "Improvements in line with "keep" comments need to be made if this is to be closed as keep. Extending for 7 days."). Now I may be misreading them, and if that's the case feel free to tell me, but afd is not cleanup and there's (generally) no requirement that improvements need to be made for an article to be kept. So I'm just curious where relists such as these are coming from. Cheers, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Abdullah Khan (Author)Dear Daniel, This is related to deletion of page Abdullah Khan (Author). It is really strange to see the comments that he is a self published author which factually incorrect. Abdullah debut novel PATNA BLUES was published by Chiki Sarkar's Juggernaut Books and has been translated into 8 languages. A chapter from PATNA BLUES is being taught at university of Kerala. It was also quoted in a couple anthologies. It has been reviewed by all major publications in South Asia. Please undelete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tannu80 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Your closing rationale on Toggl TrackDaniel, can you explain how the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toggl Track was "no consensus verging on Keep"? There was one single !vote to Delete with an explanation that it was a "personal opinion"? It just seems to me that the it was a clear consensus to Keep. Thank you! HighKing++ 22:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
La Mesa, California mayoral electionHi Daniel, you closed two AfDs [1] and [2] after only one week with only one !vote. I'd request you consider relisting these for more participation. // Timothy :: talk 01:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
Soft Deletion: The Graduate NetworkHi Daniel, I hope you're well. I just wanted to reach out regarding The Graduate Network article I wrote. It was soft-deleted with no real conviction for deletion. The original reason for writing the article was that there are several other companies with the same name and this one is the one that ranks #1 on google with 10 thousand page views per month![]() Furthermore, there are several other Wikipedia articles written about similar job search engines in a similar format: see [1] , [2]. It would be great if you could reverse the decision. If there this is absolutely no way you can undo the soft deletion, I would appreciate some pointers on how to go about getting the article published. |