Talk:Peloneustes/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 23:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Since nobody is taking it up, I will. I already had my say during peer review, and there is nothing else I could find to nitpick. Only one thing to consider before going to FAC: You are citing theses, but you do not make a difference between Bachelor theses, Master theses, and Dissertations. The latter are certainly ok, but the former two might be considered borderline sources. One could argue that original claims made by such theses may not be relevant for inclusion (by peer-reviewed papers, they are not considered relevant and are generally ignored). I'm not requesting that you change anything necessarily, but please be prepared should this issue be brought up at FAC. I am promoting this fine article now, congrats! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Slate Weasel: I forgot to add my suggestion: I would always state what type of thesis it is in the text, so that the reader is informed that the information is not from a peer-reviewed paper or secondary source. The first mention of Leslie Noè doesn't state that it is a thesis at all. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Both the Noè and McHenry theses are dissertations. Richards' thesis is a master's thesis, but it's only used to cite a single sentence, so I could probably find something to replace it. I'll definitely make the modifications to how I refer to Noè's dissertation, but I currently am only using McHenry's for information on general description and taxonomy: should I still specify that this is info from a dissertation? --Slate Weasel ⟨T - C - S⟩ 00:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- (Update a short while later) I actually am not sure what kind of thesis Noè's is, since it's for the same degree as McHenry's, I'm guessing that it's a dissertation, but I'm not entirely sure. Is there a way to find out definitively? --Slate Weasel ⟨T - C - S⟩ 00:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Both the Noè and McHenry theses are dissertations. Richards' thesis is a master's thesis, but it's only used to cite a single sentence, so I could probably find something to replace it. I'll definitely make the modifications to how I refer to Noè's dissertation, but I currently am only using McHenry's for information on general description and taxonomy: should I still specify that this is info from a dissertation? --Slate Weasel ⟨T - C - S⟩ 00:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)