Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheBrokenTusk
TheBrokenTusk
- TheBrokenTusk (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
23 May 2021
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets
- TheBrokenTusk (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Beatrix_Kiddo2004 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
The user TheBrokenTusk was warned about the 3 revert rule once here after engaging in an edit war with me on the Vellalar page. I requested a 3rd opinion for disputes resolution and was provided the same by a senior admin at the end of this extensive discussion. After that I requested TheBrokenTusk to follow the third opinion and started a new discussion. The user TheBrokenTusk ignored it and using his sock puppet Beatrix_Kiddo2004 and reverted 35 of my edits here[1]. When I exposed his sock puppetry and POV push in discussion. He deleted my talk page discussion [2]. I undid it and again called for admin help. When TheBrokenTusk again appeared to deny allegations and support his sock in accusing me of bullying them. I think Beatrix_Kiddo made a mistake and logged in using the same IP. Because he immediately reverted the talk page discussion with the pretence of undoing his earlier mistake (the earlier revert was not an accident as Beatrix Kiddo2004 didn’t just undo the talk page discussion, but reverted it precisely to an older version of another user japotalk ) to erase all evidence and the comments made by TheBrokenTusk [3]. Cyberanthropologist (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
These are baseless allegations. The user @User:Cyberanthropologist 's comments on the talk page were reverted by accident, and have been restored by me since then, which was dutifully mentioned by me in the edit history. This false accusation was already been answered and dealt with by an admin in the Vellalar talk page. The user @cyberanthropologist is vandalising the Vellalar page by removing valid citations and sources without proper reasons, and has already been edit-banned from the page before for vandalism, along with allegations of vandalism mentioned heretalk.This accusation of sock puppetry is a personal attack and nothing else. Beatrix Kiddo2004 (talk)
@Beatrix Kiddo2004: I have explained the reasons for the removal of POV push content and misleading sentences not in line with what the source states in the Vellalar talk page discussions and in the edits. I was never banned for vandalism as User:Beatrix Kiddo2004 claims, but was blocked for 48 hrs because I broke the 3 revert rule. Evidence of all of this is present on my talk page for all to see. The allegations of vandalism for on my talk page were made by another sockpuppet master User:Vicky4197 and his sock User:Crowned467 (both of whom are now banned for sock puppetry) when we engaged in an edit war on Bunt (community) page. Also the sock puppetry allegation against User:TheBrokenTusk was not answered or dealt with by any admin like his sock User:Beatrix_Kiddo2004 claims here. It was infact the admin who directed me here. Also, you reverted 35 of my edits to your sockmaster TheBrokenTusk’s last version, and he seems to use you to escape the 3 revert rule as evidenced at the Vellalar page. All this makes you highly suspicious. Cyberanthropologist (talk) 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)