User talk:Kynn

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

-- Kukini 22:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome; I deleted the big template though. :)

Thanks for the block...

Of 76.178.91.245. --Kynn 23:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Viridae ^Talk 23:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.

Saw your post at live journal. If you start I new wikiproject I'm in! futurebird 05:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Hamsher

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jane Hamsher, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spawnopedia 19:07, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... you are off-base once more here. Furthermore, you are abusing the "third level warning" tags that you copied above. You need a time-out, I think. (Note that I haven't vandalized anything, by the way). --Kynn 19:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned you repeatedly - Just stop it. Spawnopedia 19:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing you're warning me about. I haven't edited the page since your reversion. You don't understand the warning process on Wikipedia, nor is it particularly applicable here. Are you always this belligerent? --Kynn 19:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am belligerent as needs be. In this case I feel Hamsher should be LUCKY that things that I know are NOT in the article. I don't need her pal coming in and mucking it up. Spawnopedia 19:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Hamsher's pal. And I question your impartiality in this entry, given your comment above. --Kynn 19:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question anything you want. JUST STOP VANDALIZING. Spawnopedia 19:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't vandalized anything. This is like asking if I've stopped beating my wife. What's more, even if your incorrect version of "vandalism" was used, I have certainly "stopped" by any reasonable measure, since I haven't reverted your reversion to the page, nor have I re-introduced my edits. --Kynn 20:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But you want to. Yes you do. Spawnopedia 20:07, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... You're a really bad troll, you know. --Kynn 20:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:Civility and do not call me names Spawnopedia 21:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's something absurd about you telling me to be civil. BTW, your WP:Civility link didn't work. --Kynn 21:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't it? Bwahahahahha. Spawnopedia 21:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it didn't. --Kynn 21:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Troll

See this essay on trolling. Calling a person a troll is not the best thing one can do, even if one believes a person to be a troll. The receiving person usually finds it insulting. Please don't do it in the future. Philip Gronowski ^Contribs 22:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do know he's playing you, right, Philip? He's been uncivil since the start of this, and yet latched on to me saying he's not trolling effectively in order to claim victim status. Look over the history of my comments, on User talk:Spawnomedia and User talk:Jane Hamsher. He's falsely accused me of vandalism. He's made up a false story about me being "a pal of Hamsher's (sic)." He's written all of the following to me:

I am belligerent as needs be. In this case I feel Hamsher should be LUCKY that things that I know are NOT in the article. I don't need her pal coming in and mucking it up.
If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jane Hamsher, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
But you want to [revert the reversion]. Yes you do.
Therefore, the article is very valid and has been up here now in this form for some time and is not for you to question. Thanks for playing though.
Are you therefore slamming the site? This can lead to banning.
Nice Try cowboy- the changes in dispute were reverted by you. Now stop the vandalism or get reported it is that simple.
This is a bozo no no. Hence, vandalism.
You have shown yourself unwilling or incapable of working with others.
Please do not make changes again. Either use the Sandbox or an Etch A Sketch instead.
It is not personal to point out you have no idea what you are doing.
YOU are vandalizng. And apparently will not stop it.
rewriting the sentence so it pleases you is considered vandalism.
The purpose of the talk page is to discuss changes not to give you carte blanche to rewrite an article about your friend.
Get a grip. This page is to discuss diputed changes NOT TO GIVE YOU PERMISSION to go make them. The point of the article seems to me that she gets sued on every film she does. This is not POV this is reality backed up by footnotes.
I am not impatient YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. The changes you propose are disputed ERGO DO NOT MAKE THEM. This is vandalism
Look, here is the deal, I will type slowly so you can follow me.
Don't quit your day job
This does not give you license to come in an alter an article that is well sourced and accurate just for jollies'
See [http:/www.ratemypoo.com] for the contrary position
Once I weighed in you had no right except those I give you.
You have been illogical and threatening more vandalism. I gave up trying to deal with your irrationality.

Not once since the beginning of the discussion has this user ever been civil. Not once has he assumed good faith on my part -- instead, continually accusing me of vandalism even after I pointed out that it was no such thing -- and he uses other namecalling such as "bozo," "cowboy," "illogical," and "irrational." This isn't a normal user. This is likely someone who got banned indefinitely last month under another username and still hasn't learned from the experience.

And in interests of fairness, you let him tell you who to go argue with? C'mon, Philip. He called you names ("son") even as he was complaining that I called him a name. Don't let him play you like that. --Kynn 22:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me SIR, SON is not a name, it is a conveyance of respect to someone younger. Ask your Dad. FACT- You proposed an NPOV debate on the Hamsher article. FACT- I respectfully disagreed with you. FACT you then MADE THE CHANGES ANYWAY . Fact- I asked you to stop and you spent the whole day arguing with me. The guy is not being played. He isn't falling for your nonsense. Stop accusing me of things and calling me names. Fact is, there are rules to follow with Wikipedia editing and YOU REFUSE to follow them.