Jump to content

User talk:A.A Prinon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A.A Prinon (talk | contribs) at 05:02, 10 September 2021 (→‎UTRS 47923: Replying to Deepfriedokra (using reply-link)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A.A Prinon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Alright, I'll try to address these comments here, since clearly nobody is reading what I've already written about this elsewhere.

First, @Lugnuts: Look, I very clearly know the reason why you seldom get frustrated or feel harassed. The thing is- you find it disconcerting to have me show up hours or days after you make an edit, right? But if you think a little or ignore these, it's not a big issue at all. I just make a few edits (30-50 or at best 80) per day, while I don't think that you just stick to a very few edits per day. I have reviewed the diffs you linked at User talk:Sasquatch#Lugnuts. On 10 July 2021, I had total 2 interactions with you, one this and the other this. In the very next day (11 July), I had had the same number of interactions (2) with you. The clincher for me is, when I make about 50 edits per day, I only have 2 interactions with you, then how you can believe that it is hounding? If I was following your edits, I would always keep my eye on those and edit according to your contributions, while I am not doing this. I guess you make a lot of edits in a single day, hence can you explain to me the reason for feeling harassed with just 2 interactions with me in a day? Actually, if we keep fighting with each other and keep accusing, then we will never be able to improve the encyclopedia, rather we would all be dead by then. We both work in the same project (cricket) and our goals are also the same- improving the cricket articles. Hence, in my book, interactions and overlaps are very normal or simple, if you are being positive. But if you are always thinking negatively, it will neither help you nor the Wikipedia, rather it will act as a barrier in improving WP, particularly cricket articles. I will suggest you to forget all hostilities with me and collaboratively edit with me, will you? It is actually very easy and also helpful. Tell me one thing- do you only face interactions with me, don't you see overlaps with other editors. I guess yes, but you don't feel harassed when you are interacting with them, but you are feeling annoyed when interacting with me, and the main reason for that is we keep fighting with each other. In other words, lets stop fighting and starting disputes among ourselves, rather let us work here collaboratively. I believe it will help both of us as well as help in reducing annoyance and distress. Trust me, I had zero intentions in causing you annoyance, as I appreciate your work here. Yes, my contributions may not be as helpful as yours are, but I believe I have done some good or productive work for the project. Example, recently on 31st July, one of my articles got promoted to featured list (!), sadly I can't celebrate it anyway because of being blocked. The previous incident I had with you on 1 July 2021 was not acceptable, I agree. Actually, as you were reverting my good edits in some articles, I felt anger and so made this and this edit summaries. Agree I should not have done it, but since then I was unblocked, I largely changed my nature or tendency. My contribs clears it all, on 1 July I had many interactions with you and were reverting your edits. However, it wasn't as same as after being unblocked, I have made only 2 overlaps with you. I am really sorry, if I have caused you very much distress or if it was preventing you from working here. But, I think we should draw a line under this and make progress forward. As I have said already elsewhere, I had been always making such type of edits (which are cited at Sasquatch talk). That includes- updates based on match reports, infobox stats update or anything else. I have already cited those above, hope it helps. Thank you and please Lugnuts reply here  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 06:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appears to be a message to Lugnuts rather than an unblock request. – bradv🍁 01:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition, think a little. such as- If I hadn't made this edit, would people know about this significant record. Again if I didn't made this edit would general readers know about the information. Hence, I am always editing here for the betterment of WP, not to cause you distress particularly.  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 06:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @আফতাবুজ্জামান: for appreciating my contributions on Wikipedia, by emailing me. You are perhaps the only person to do so. When I had 4 interactions in 4 days (out of my about 320 edits in these 4 days) with a user, admins have blocked me claiming that I was hounding. This is completely biased accusation, or is it enough to justify a block for only 4 interactions, when these types of edits were always made by me. Note: I have not even evaded my block by editing with another account in this meantime, which CheckUsers will able to verify using behavioural or technical data.  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 05:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think many are enjoying seeing me blocked. 2021 Bangladeshi cricket season, 2021 Arachas Super T20 Trophy, 2021–22 National Cricket League etc many articles created by me are not being updated when I am blocked. So, if I were unblocked, I would just cause damage or disruption, right? @Lugnuts: Do you keep track of such news like this and this? And now, the project is being benefited when most important articles of the project are not being updated.  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 05:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2020–21 National Cricket League Logo.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:2020–21 National Cricket League Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, A.A Prinon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alaap (smartphone app), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 47923

UTRS appeal #47923 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra, Wait, I didn't send any appeal through UTRS. I think this is a mistake.  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 05:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]