This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
Obviously, image 2. There is no justification for ignoring the clearer eye, which is more representative of the storm at its peak around that time. @Hurricaneboy23: You really ought to be subject to a strict WP:1RR on images. --Jasper Deng(talk) 10:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am to come forth and say that Image 1 is a better choice since for one thing it is not unrealistically dark for the time of day it was taken and is a higher resolution image then the low-quality PNGs you get from RAMMB-SLIDER. Peak intensity isn't everything, and I doubt any user is really looking for the PERFECT details of the clear eye which is already partially clear in the first image. According to the WP:IMG guidelines, EOSDIS Worldview images are preferred anyhow and should be used when available!! Hurricaneboy23(page) * (talk) 16:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricaneboy23: Let's see you not WP:SHOUT (with the all-caps "PERFECT" and double exclamation marks) for once.
Anyways, representativeness of the storm (or in general) is the first priority and a clearer eye closer to peak is undisputably more representative of the storm than even a higher-resolution one with a more clouded eye. The darkness is not an issue considering our use of IR images. In general, if we want to deviate from peak intensity we have better have good reasons to do so and resolution is not one of them when the great majority of readers will not view these images even close to their full resolution.--Jasper Deng(talk) 18:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
too easy, image 2 FleurDeOdile 18:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I support Image 2. Far clearer eye, less overexposed, and closer to true peak. --8medalkid (talk) 18:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]