User talk:Moneytrees
±
vn-38 | This user talk page has been vandalized 38 times. |
This is Moneytrees's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31Auto-archiving period: 3 days |
RevDel
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
(I archived the last one, it was getting too long) Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 22:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, ty. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 21:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Could you check Kudremukh, first copyvio check I've done in a while. (And check my cont. for more that I've done, If I do anymore.) Thanks! Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 21:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Best Who? Anyways, I revdel'd it. I'll look into the user's other edits too. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 21:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Best who? What does that mean. Also thanks for revdeling it! Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 21:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- I said "Best who?" because you didn't sign your comment, so there's nothing after "best," and I joked "Best who?" I guess it made more sense in my head. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 21:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oh xd, I thought I signed it, ty again. Best, who Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 21:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- I said "Best who?" because you didn't sign your comment, so there's nothing after "best," and I joked "Best who?" I guess it made more sense in my head. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 21:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Best who? What does that mean. Also thanks for revdeling it! Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 21:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Ruigeroeland is now fully populated
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
Unfortunately there's thousands, even tens of thousands, more articles that aren't basic prose compared to the Dr. Blofeld CCI. I may have to turn up the settings somewhat, but that's only partial relief. What's the plan?
Addendum: I think I can eliminate another few thousand articles by turning up the settings. MER-C 19:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- MER-C, I'm thinking of having a survey team (there's 5 or so people on discord who could help with it) over it for a few days and then filling out my guide off of that. I'll do what I did with the Blofeld CCI guide, but won't make the mistakes I made with that one. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 15:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Second pass completed, over 10000 articles removed. Ugh, I really don't want to do this again. MER-C 20:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've released this to the regulars. It turns out the very last article in the CCI is a vio. The only thing I can think of is... have fun! MER-C 12:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Second pass completed, over 10000 articles removed. Ugh, I really don't want to do this again. MER-C 20:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Why Have You Accused *Me* of Making Personal Attacks?
Why me? Have you read the link you left me with the warning: No_personal_attacks?
It begins with the goal of creating a "collaborative atmosphere needed to create a good encyclopedia."
Explaining, "derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks or even bans."
Carry on reading the page, and you will see it makes no mention of vulgarity being used as it is meant to, grab one's attention and disrupt their current mode or behavior. What he did, and what the next person did was anything but what a "collaborative atmosphere" feels like.
There's not add-on on GitHub where users can claim I broke some law, created a legal situation demanding the immediate speedy deletion with no regard for any sort of due process. Why is there one here? It's obviously broken. It needs to include examples. Don't leave it up to the innocent to prove their innocence, or the speedy crew to be infallible in their dedication to attention and detail. Louis Waweru Talk 22:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Apology
I am really sorry about the copyright violations. I have understood my faults Please unban me and give me a single chance to correct myself. Thanks User:2006nishan178713 17:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thanks for pointing out the plagiarism in my article
sir kindly let me know the draft article Draft:Gallium 68 PSMA-11, submitted is okay or not. you pointed out plagiarism yesterday. thanks a lot for helping and guiding. regards Soman. Rahulsoman (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Rahulsoman I'm not really familiar with the topic area, so I can't really comment on whether the article would be accepted or not. However the plagiarism issues are all fixed so I have no issue there. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 17:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the response sir. Happy to read your reply. Rahulsoman (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
blocked indefinitely / plagiarism
Sounds about right. How do I turn this around? Filipe46 (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)