Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeryGoodBoy
VeryGoodBoy
- VeryGoodBoy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
27 November 2021
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- SsSsSs0909 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ghuaadg441 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User SsSsSs0909 has similar edit interests associated with East Asians and genetic studies about East Asians. A tendency to support a "northern route origin" for East Asians and Northeast Asian supremacist agenda (specifically Korean nationalist agendas). Typical behavior seems to be dismissing any link between Northeast Asians and Southeast Asians as well as rejecting any ancestral link or southern origin for East Asians (such as the mainstream model of a southern coastal dispersal for East-Eurasians). Prolific edits on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia, as well as cross-wiki edits linked to Wikimedia files. Specifically compare SsSsSs0909 and Ghuaadg441. Also note the style of naming their sock accounts. Another suspicious link is found to user Bookworm0808.
Also specifically look to the cross-wiki vandalism and POV by Ghuaadg441:[1]. Here the same pattern as Ghuaadg441, cross-wiki edits, specifically related to East Asians and haplogroups:[2].
The user SsSsSs0909 also seems to be very knowledgeable about another sock user known as “WorldCreaterFighter", which seems suspicious for a new user. It is very unlikely that a new user comes instantly in an edit war and accuses others to be sock puppets. Furthermore, unconstructive edits, deleting large amounts of sourced content and replacing it with sentences copy pasted from an older 2011 study, which more fits his agenda, as well as misleading edit summaries, is not a constructive contribution to Wikipedia.ToRespond (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)