Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personalities Renowned By Mother Names
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:55, 1 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:55, 1 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Personalities Renowned By Mother Names (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Delete exegetical posting without sourcing appears to be WP:OR. Carlossuarez46 05:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR. However, I think should consider converting all our articles to that format. - Rocket000 06:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Query: Huh? It doesn't even have any formatting. It is bare ASCII text. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, bad joke. :) Rocket000 19:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This seems to be an obscure debate within Islam about how souls are named on reaching heaven[1]. The limited reading I've done indicates that it's disputed in any event. Until WP:NPOV and WP:OR can be satisfied, it should go. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 14:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:COPYRIGHT; this is clearly a copy-paste of someone's material from a message board or blog, and we have zero evidence that the poster of it here was the original author (though perhaps related; they share "Ammar" in their names). — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it's from here [2] or here [3] and are straight lifts from Islamic texts. AFAIK Allah has not released these texts under GFDL. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 00:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete incomprehensible list. JJL 13:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.