Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Rizzotti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:51, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:51, 2 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Matt Rizzotti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Minor league baseball player who has not made it past the single-A level yet. Gsearch doesn't show evidence of notability. Speedy was denied, so I assume a prod will be contested. Fabrictramp 16:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletions. —Fabrictramp 16:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Note that a speedy deletion being declined need not imply a prod won't work. Stifle (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete recreate when he reaches Triple-A at least, currently single-A isn't really fully professional, fails several guidelines. This is a Secret account 18:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable enough yet. NawlinWiki 22:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. JJL 22:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too soon for him. Has some college baseball awards, but nothing of note in the minors (A- level currently). Spanneraol 16:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete claim to notability is playing with another person of borderline notability. (Wouldnt have worked if the other person had been No1 in the world.) Victuallers 10:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.