Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rex King-Clark
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:41, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:41, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 04:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability not established. Mais oui! 23:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Keep per rewrite. --Mais oui! 17:48, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The article makes no claim about his notability. Possibly his photographs are notable, but from the article it is not apparent whether his photographs are any different than those of any other pilot doing aerial reconnaissance. — Saxifrage ✎ 23:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Sax--Deville (Talk) 01:24, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Changing my vote to keep, it looks to me that the article is certainly worth keeping at this point. Good work, Mouse.--Deville (Talk) 15:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve. He is also an author of 3 books [1]. "Forward from Kohima" [2] [3] [4] seems to be the most widely known. -- AnonEMouse 19:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Here, I've been bitten by the WP:HEY bug, and rewritten the article. Please look it over, and say whether it's worth keeping now. AnonEMouse 18:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.