Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of kunoichi in popular culture
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:58, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:58, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of kunoichi in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Just a list of loosely associated topics, fails WP:NOT#DIR Jay32183 17:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:FIVE - Trivia collection Corpx 17:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#DIR and WP:FIVE. Otto4711 17:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per Trivia Sawblade05 17:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Now it is List and IPC in the title and no sources. --JForget 23:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment So what's a kunoichi? Mandsford 01:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a female ninja, but that shouldn't be how to determine "keep" or "delete". Jay32183 01:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorize and then delete. Having a category would aid navigation of those interested in the topic, but the list really doesn't have a utility. CaveatLectorTalk 01:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorization is an excellent suggestion. Under Fictional Ninjas perhaps. Canuckle 17:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Abberley2 01:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all %SUBJECT% in popular culture lists, they are nothing but trivia and violate the five pillars of Wikipedia as well. Burntsauce 22:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.