Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DAV Public School Sasaram
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:34, 5 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:34, 5 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G12, copyright violation of http://davmodeliitkgp.org/dload/davpro.pdf (no prejudice against non-vopyvio recreation with independent sources) Mgm|(talk) 09:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- DAV Public School Sasaram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested speedy delete. Entire article appears to be copied out of brochures and/or handbooks for the school, failing WP:ADVERT KuyaBriBriTalk 17:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Stub - This is terrible and probably a copyvio to boot. Inclusion guidelines are usually very forgiving of schools, so I wouldn't argue for a delete. But it definitely needs to be stubbed and the author(s) gently pointed in the general direction of WP:FIRST and WP:STYLE. "Dedicated souls"? Hmmm. §FreeRangeFrog 18:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this is a significant high school. The issues should be dealt with by cleaning up and sourcing, not by deletion. TerriersFan (talk) 20:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.