Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasan Fuat Sari
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:15, 5 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hasan Fuat Sari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable artist. Part is a copyright violation but the main thing is there is no mention of him at Google News, Google Scholar (not surprising though), and some odd ones at Google books. Overall, Google doesn't show anything much other than a gallery or listings on self-described art websites. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- When I Google "Hasan Fuat Sari" I find 1,300 results. It might be a common name though. I add in the word "sculptor" and get 114 hits, and with just the word artist get 196. Google then tells me only 70 of those hits are relevant when I click on the last page. All of these links seem to be listings in art directories where anyone can add their name. So, to the creator of this page, please state why this person is noteworthy. Have they won any internationally recognized awards of significance? I see paintings by the person selling for thousands of dollars each. Usually when you are famous your paintings sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars, or millions even. Dream Focus (talk) 09:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non.notable, and also sounds like advertising copy.Yobmod (talk) 09:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, spoke too soon. Found some articles about him here and here. Still doesn't indicate much in terms of notability
but will work on incorporating them into the article. Also note that the article creator has uploaded images of the artwork as "self-made" so there might be COI here as well. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strike that. I want to look into the introduction first. It feels like another copyright violation as well. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This page is so badly written it would have to be rewritten from scratch anyway. To much like a promotional.PB666 yap 21:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I have now created a new article about Hasan Fuat Sari. I hope it will be accepted by the community. --Beraranders22 (talk) 11:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]