User talk:Deranged bulbasaur

I did not realize that was against the rules i will delete it immediately. can you provide my with another alternative? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasemcc (talk • contribs)

Not really. You could conceivably add mention of this commercial activity to your userpage as something you're involved in. Please sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~.

Thanks, I appreciate it. Chasemcc 12:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Bridgeman

I disagree with your assertions that Caroline Bridgeman's page is unencyclopaedic.

Caroline Bridgeman was a governor of the BBC as well as a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (a category on Wikipedia containing many names).

I also think you should have contacted me directly before putting up a tag as WP:AFG. Jill Teed 13:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere did I imply bad faith on your part. Furthermore, nowhere did I imply that the whole article is unencyclopedic. When a tag is put under a specific section, and it says it can apply to either a section or an article, it applies to the section. Just because she's notable doesn't necessarily mean her children are, or that a list thereof should be in an encyclopedia.

Actually when I referred to good faith I was referring to your not having, again, contacted me directly before putting an undeserved and ugly tag on a page I created.Jill Teed 16:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In any event if you check the page now, you will see why it was not only acceptable, but necessary to include her children (3/4 of whom are important in their own right and have their own pages on Wikipedia). Also, her husband's page lists the same four children and you did not tag that page. Please try to be consistent.Jill Teed 16:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you persist in this harassment just because I tagged a page of yours, I will seek administrator intervention. Furthermore, I highly suspect you're just adding your genaeology to wikipedia, which poses a conflict of interest.

This claim of "harassment" is ridiculous--all I am doing is responding to your erroneously tagging my page and showing why you were in error. It seems you simply don't want to acknowledge your mistake.

The tag was not a mistake when it was created. I'm glad you addressed the issue and rendered it irrelevant, but a list of random descendents without any indication in sight as to what the significance might be *is* {{unencyclopedic}}. If you think that kind of tagging is personal effrontery, you're being far too sensitive. In any case, I don't see the problem. Seems like standard operating procedure to me. You fixed the issue, and I let the tag lapse. Coming here to gloat over how you were right all along and how I shouldn't dare to tag your articles is, frankly, juvenile. Deranged bulbasaur 23:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contact an admin if you want, I've done nothing wrong. And I am in no way related to the Bridegemans or any other English family; also your meaningless and unfounded accusation goes against WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL.

If you retag my page, I will regard it as harrassment and contact an Admin. myself.Jill Teed 16:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page "regagged." Contact an admin if you want.

Just so you know, DB, the idea behind WP:PROD is that anyone can remove the tag. If you still want it deleted, you're not supposed to keep restoring the prod tag, but rather nominate for deletion. Thanks! --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I've done no such thing. I have not once restored the PROD tag. In fact, I repudiated my own rationale. He's creating all this fuss over what was a simple {{unencyclopedic}} tag on some random list of names. He's since fleshed out the list of names, so I let that tag drop as well.

If you don't believe me, consult the history of the article in question. In any case, I'm in danger of letting my anger get the better of me, so I'll just drop it. I regret having proposed the article for deletion.

Nick Fanuzzi

DB, Please jot over to the Fanuzzi Talk page and see if it passes muster. Thanks, Pepto gecko 02:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opalelement Talk Page

"Deletion of User talk warnings: Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked." I deleted them form my talk page because they were handled already and i thought they weren't needed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Opalelement (talk • contribs) 05:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

They are needed in light of the fact that you still create pages that are insufficiently notable. Jcink.com was just now deleted, FYI.

Yeah i saw it was deleted, I really have to contest, what do have to do, get a petition? I could get about 100 signatures or probably more, all from people who think Jcink.com helps them and can help others, which is why i made it... It helped me alot and it can help others, and isn't that kinda the point of wikipedia, to help others? Just tell me what i need to do to make it stay and i will. Opalelement 05:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A petition by the *users* will probably not be helpful. You can petition the wikipedia administrators at Wikipedia:Deletion review by following the instructions there. In the future, please sign your posts with ~~~~

Manuelcragi

Sorry, can you help me... I don't know how to do that, I didn't want to do vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manuelcragi (talk • contribs)

It's what you *are* doing, not what you aren't doing. When somebody adds a tag like {{notability}} to an article of yours, don't remove it unless you provide a rationale, or do something substantial to correct the underlying concern. Also, it's customary to add new material to the *bottom* of pages like this.

Ok, sorry for both things, I'm still learning (; I already modified the content saying that the project is in pre-production in my university, the art institute of vancouver, we are going to shoot the pilot very soon.

Twin souls

Any chance you could add all the Twin souls characters and the pre-production into your AfD? Saves the trouble of doing them all individually. --Steve _(Slf67)^talk 09:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to do that. Sounds good, though.

I'm gonna try it, I never thought that create an article was going to be so difficult