Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eoin Pattison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:55, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:55, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. WaltonOne 17:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Eoin Pattison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
According to an anon's edit summary: "lacks notability related to Irish politicians and didn't get selected himself- and thats it. not widely known in ireland" I concur. The polician was never elected, but was a candidate who lost in the elections. Sr13 11:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per precedent for losers of local elections. In this scenario, history really is written by the winners. :) YechielMan 16:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 03:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, normally I would agree with you guys, but since he is a third generation of a political family running for office, I must say to keep it.. In this case I do think he is notable. Callelinea 02:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Sr13 and Yechielman. Being related to a politician is not per se notability, except -- possibly -- being a nobleman. He's a hole in the ground. Bearian 18:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, insufficient notability in his own right. NawlinWiki 00:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if he had got election to the Dail I would have said keep - he didnt therefore delete as he is not notable.--Vintagekits 17:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.