Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael W. Wooten
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:34, 9 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:34, 9 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 08:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Michael W. Wooten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable artist. Article appears to be used for promotion of commercial art sales. Leeannedy 10:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unable to find any sources that establish notability. JulesH 12:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per nom. The only sources I could find online were art-for-sale sites and Wikipedia mirrors. --Evb-wiki 12:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I looked and couldn't find any sources either. Psu256 13:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I found one new reference to him. Military art isn't my thing but he seams to be very good at it and is probably notable in his field.Callelinea 18:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you please cite your reference? Is it anything other than the artist's own website or Wikipedia mirrors? If it is recognized within his field, other references to his notability should be available. Leeannedy 21:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Modernist 17:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Psu256. Bearian
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.