Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Peter Mancroft Church, Norwich
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:58, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:58, 10 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sr13 02:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- St. Peter Mancroft Church, Norwich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
non-notable church Montchav 19:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 15th century perpendicular Gothic building replacing an even older church, so hardly non-notable. The article is extremely short, but that's not a reason to delete. Emeraude 12:37, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Stubs are acceptable content. No exact reason given for nom. DGG (talk) 23:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep It certainly is notable and I have added a little text to assert notability. I suggest that the nominator could have done some work to establish notability and to improve the article instead of putting it up for AfD. --Malcolmxl5 08:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Highly notable on architectural grounds. Golfcam 17:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think it's a safe assumption that there a many references to this church in scholarly architecture books and local history books about Norwich and Norfolk. Abberley2 02:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Needs merging with St Peter Mancroft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.76.254 (talk • contribs) 12:50, July 26, 2007
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.