Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angeles Aikido Club
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:08, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:08, 11 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 06:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Angeles Aikido Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The club is not that notable - even more so in that very few dojo are actually mentioned in the Aikido category. The one or two that are - are because they are Style Headquarters or the dojo of a very eminant Aikidoist. This dojo does not cover either situation. Peter Rehse 05:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as not notable if we list every school of every art we'd have thousands of one line articles, or adverts --Nate1481( t/c) 08:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.