Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalian Hansen
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:24, 14 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:24, 14 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dalian Hansen[edit]
- Dalian Hansen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article about a Second Life character. Hard to see how it is notable. References are a blog post and a bunch of Second Life–related websites. —Chowbok ☠ 15:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - sources are blogs, not reliable; many links are dead; a few constitute trivial mentions in any case. Savidan 17:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 20-Mule-Team Delete: This has to be some joke. An article about a Second Life character?? This is one of the very rare articles so egregious as to provoke me to go through the creator's contribution list to see what other similar aberrations he's gifted Wikipedia. Certainly fails WP:V, and I can't imagine what criteria of notability would apply. Ravenswing 01:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 14:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.