Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradycubia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 01:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bradycubia

A poorly attested neologism for the practice commonly known as karezza or coitus reservatus. 195 unique Google hits, on Wikipedia mirrors and swinger sites. Pilatus 03:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Shows up on The Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices Ruby 03:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Snickers
No vote at the moment. Would it be proper to merge and redirect to coitus reservatus? I'm no expert on this topic (*insert snickers here*), but if someone who knows more about this agrees that these are rather similar and linked topics, then I'd vote for that. --Kinu 03:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever we do, let's not rush, so to speak. Ruby 04:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- ... *grins sheepishly* :P --Kinu 04:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-encyclopædic Avi 04:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or keep, per Ruby. Kappa 04:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic. Royboycrashfan 05:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If sheep are involved, definitely delete -- Simon Cursitor 08:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect but very very very slowly ;-) Carlossuarez46 19:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ruby. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 13:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.