Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bg face
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:17, 14 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 03:17, 14 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bg face (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Emoticon neologism. Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A7: No sources (links to images were used as sources previously), so notability is not asserted. Almost no Google hits actually talking about emoticon. Robert Skyhawk So sue me! (You'll lose) 21:16, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments for others to ponder. these Google image hits for "Bg face" suggest there are many uses apart from the article definition. "Bg face" +emoticon yielded 6 hits that do not support the use of this term. A Google search for "Bg face" yielded just over 200 hits. In skimming throught these, I found none that support the article with verifiable information from reliable sources. I earlier deleted a fragmented version as WP:CSD#G1. I have asked the creator to provide RS for this. I removed external links that were to four versionsof the image without textual content. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 21:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per apparent lack of independent reliable sources covering this that establish notability. Wiw8 (talk) 14:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my comments above. NN protologism. Dlohcierekim 00:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.