Talk:IO2

No reason has been offered for deletion of this page. It follows format and is simply a compilation of already published information on a topic, with fully cited sources. So why delete? Stho002 (talk) 01:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I marked it for deletion as I cannot make heads or tails of it. Is IO2 supposed to be a company or a product? As well, the article isn't written in a way which is clear and easy to understand for the layman. Do you think we can userfy this article and work on it together? Basket of Puppies 02:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

See reply on your talk page. Stho002 (talk) 02:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

(from my talk page)

My apologies, Stho002, but it's a basic precept that Wikipedia can only have articles which are notable, verifiable and backed up by reliable sources. Furthermore, the article should try to come to the standards and guidelines as listed here, which is about how to start a new article and what to avoid. As far as the privacy issue, all I can say is that this is not how Wikipedia operates. My apologies, but I must leave the deletion tag in place for now and until the point where the article matures quite a bit. Basket of Puppies 02:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

See reply on your talk page. Stho002 (talk) 02:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

(from my talk page)

Stho002, synthesis of information, or putting a novel spin on an issue, is not something that Wikipedia is allowed to do. Further, the article as you have written it does not meet the encyclopedic standards. It can possibly be merged with FRST, but I cannot see how it can be an article on its own. Again, I apologize. Basket of Puppies 02:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I dispute your claims about synthesis (see your talk page for my reply) Stho002 (talk) 04:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)