User talk:Ryanisbetter

May 2022

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jake Paul. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Level three warning because user has been warned about not using references before and blanked their talk page. TylerBurden (talk) 11:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing mention of Julia entirely was probably appropriate as the sources that exist for their relationship fail WP:RS. However, I am not the one who added her in the first place nor do I care enough to backtrack through the article's edit history to find out who did, not do I feel that adding it is "controversial." I updated the page because it is clear from Julia's Instagram posts that they are back together and the article claimed that they were not. Simple as that. As for blanking my talk page page, this is my talk page not yours. Ryanisbetter (talk) 02:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to update the references then, at the very least. Just mentioning Instagram in an edit summary is not providing a reliable source. See WP:RS. I don't care about your blanking of your own talk page, I added that for context so that people can see why there is only a level three warning on your talk, it's because you've been warned before and removed them. Feel free to blank this as well, the edit history of your talk page will remain so all the warnings are still there. TylerBurden (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said. The sources for her inclusion in the first place (which I am not the one who added) all failed WP:RS to begin with. So removing mention of her entirely was probably fair. But if I see something I know to be factually incorrect I will change it. It said they were not currently together and they are.Ryanisbetter (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]