Jump to content

Category talk:National coats of arms

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:40, 25 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconHeraldry and vexillology Category‑class
WikiProject iconCategory:National coats of arms is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Capitalisation

Lots of the articles in this cat are named 

Coats of Arms of ...

shouldnt it be 

Coats of arms of ...

Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted images

This is a set of links to COPYRIGHTED images! Skull 'n' Femurs 01:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move from "Arms" to "arms"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was to move all the pages without a bot, just like in the good ole days! --Lox (t,c) 19:27, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know of any reason to capitalize the word Arms in articles like Coat of Arms of Cuba. I move that the word Arms be made lowercase in the title of every such article. dbenbenn | talk 01:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's a lot of articles to correct - but like you I can't see any reason for the word 'arms' having a capital letter. I would have hoped for more of a response than this! --Lox (t,c) 12:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this completely. Good luck with all the work you'll have to do, though... I assume you've got a bot ready for that? ;) —Nightstallion (?) 00:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Kids these days, always expecting bots to do everything. We used to know the meaning of a good day's work! I'll start moving them manually, with a link to this discussion in the summary. Feel free to help out. dbenbenn | talk 13:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good stuff, am helping out as well (having stolen your edit summary!) --Lox (t,c) 18:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Though my edit summary was rather lazy ("WP:NC"). —Nightstallion (?) 19:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Terminology

A lot of these are called "state emblems" or "state seals" etc., and aren't really coats of arms in the traditional Western heraldic sense... AnonMoos 15:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:National_coats_of_arms&oldid=1089765561"