Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baxter Park
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:06, 25 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Craigiebank, Dundee. While the park has been the subject of secondary, reliable sources, it seems the content would be more suitable within a broader article. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Baxter Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails:WP:NOTABILITY RP459 (talk) 16:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a guideline? Care to explain why you feel this article doesn't pass WP:NOTABILITY?--Oakshade (talk) 23:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for fixing up this article! The version that I AFD'd did not show any notability and my quick search did not show me anything that would lend me to think that it was a notable park. As the article stands now I think it passes WP:Notability. RP459 (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a guideline? Care to explain why you feel this article doesn't pass WP:NOTABILITY?--Oakshade (talk) 23:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- Theleftorium 18:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This park seems to have got a fair amount of coverage, most notably two articles on BBC News where Baxter Park is the subject of the article. However, I'm not sure enough can be written about this article to grow beyond a stub, and there's barely anything worth merging. Not sure what to do with this. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Passes WP:NOTABILITY. Has received significant coverage from reliable secondary sources like BBC News and others [1][2][3], the core criteria of WP:NOTABILITY.--Oakshade (talk) 23:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Craigiebank, Dundee. Has coverage but not sufficient to sustain an entire article. Mind you the Craigiebank article suggests the Park "borders" the area rather than being in it. Anyone from Dundee care to comment? Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 09:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as above. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 13:58, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.