Jump to content

User talk:paperpseudonym

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Paperpseudonym (talk | contribs) at 09:49, 15 July 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


If you have something to say, feel free to drop a message here and i'll be more than happy to help out.

July 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- ferret (talk) 18:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

I've read your email. You're free to appeal your block from your original account, HimuTheEditor. This is not a valid cleanstart, as Cleanstarts require you to avoid areas and editing you previously did. It immediately became clear this account was yours, even prior to the checkuser confirmation. Disappearing each time you come under scrutiny only to create a new account and continue to same editing interests is sockpuppetry. -- ferret (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

but why it's matter? all the edits i made were faithful, weren't they? this is just... i don't understand. i just don't understand. i dislike my previous names used here, my ocd just won't let me use them. can't i just continue editing here?
i maybe bad at counting, but aight, just point me right here, which edits are disruptive or do not follow guidelines that i made from this account? paperpseudonym (talk) 19:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOCK. I'm not here to debate. You can appeal on your original account. If you no longer like that name, after appealing, you can ask for a username change through the proper channels. Read WP:Guide to appealing blocks. -- ferret (talk) 19:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oi oi oi oi, what the hell is going on. This is not a valid cleanstart, as Cleanstarts require you to avoid areas and editing you previously did. Wikipedia just doesn't says that, it says using the new account to make disruptive edits, all the edits i made from Paper are legit. You can't even point out one that's disruptive. Why don't you just come front and say it that you just got pissed that i made changes to your favourite James Bay articles, I literally just changed, commas to , the page lags, it lags, do you hear me, there's only so much space around on Wikipedia.

I refuse, call some other admin and have a look at it, i just refuse this that you just go on with your pointless attacks at me, seriously, ah, your edits are faithful, but eh we noticed you were the owner of the past 2 accounts? how else are we supposed to do it?!?!.paperpseudonym (talk) 09:49, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]