User talk:Merzul
Refs
Thanks for the tip:) These references are quite hard work and I still haven't got the hang of them. I haven't had to do them like this on any of the other articles, but some of the others were so particular on the talk page. I should cultivate pity really, life can't be easy for them what with their Asperger syndrome:)Merkinsmum 12:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gillian McKeith
You say "This is not something I'm very happy about." Sorry to hear that. Relax. Have a cookie.
You also note that "I'm essentially following this to learn about how difficult articles are handled on wikipedia." SlimVirgin and I handle difficulties very differently as our personalities differ quite a bit. She enjoys winning battles and wins many every day, helping wikipedia in numerous ways both large and small. I enjoy learning and teaching and every day I spend far more time reading and learning than engaging in battles. Wikipedia is helped by different types of people each helping in ways that are enjoyable for them. As I tell people, if you aren't having fun, you aren't doing it right. If you want to follow a dispute from a year ago to learn one way of dealing with article disputes; I encountered Northmeister and Will Beback on the article Mixed economy and wound up refereeing their dispute concerning the American System as archived here:Talk:American School/archive1 and it was all nicely tied up with a bow here Talk:American School (economics). What started with Northmeister's rants at "WILL BEBACKS ABUSIVE BEHAVIOR" on 24 May 2006 ended with "I want to thank WILL and WAS --Northmeister" on 28 June 2006. It was fun and I learned a lot. WAS 4.250 22:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Omnibenevolence
Hey no problem. It is weird why someone would seem to have a grudge against the word, I've come across it quite a bit in (academic) philosophy...