Jump to content

Talk:Eagle Forum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.171.60.23 (talk) at 15:53, 25 February 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Conservapedia charged Wikipedia with liberal bias - pffft

Secular content is not biased. Conservapedia, on the other hand, uses outright fundamentalist bias to attack Wikipedia. How Americancentric can you be to deem Wikipedia biased for including substitutions of labor with labour. And if Wikipedia uses censorship too much, what can defend Conservapedia's prevention of even creating an account. Fundamentalists need to cry somewhere else, Wikipedia is a home of secular objectivity. 68.163.32.207 06:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find it a little odd that the example given of "bias" is so laughably minor compared to the fact that the site declares on its front page that faith is unique to Christianity, contains articles presenting creationism as fact, has statements of opinion directly in the summary of articles, and so on. I get that it might be a parody of criticism of bias at wikipedia (their examples are indeed pretty laughable), but uncyclopedia is the place for parody.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eagle_Forum&oldid=110842338"