User talk:Bmg916

Welcome to the Talk page for Bmg916 ! User Page · Talk page · Awards · Contributions · Edit count · Sandbox

Archives

Great Start

Thanks for the Barnstar. It's nice to be recognized for the work that I put into this place. I may not write the encyclopedia, but I teach the newcomers to do so, which I feel is more beneficial in the longrun. BTW,

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		You may have only been here for a month, but already you have shown us that you are a very skilled and valuable vandal fighter. With the various types of vandalism exclusive to wrestling articles, recognizing all of them like you do so soon after joining is truly incredible. Keep up the good work, -- The Hyb rid 00:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, -- The Hyb rid 00:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Warnings

Yeah, I know what you mean. I think the most frustrating thing is when people try to add good things & AGF, but the way they type it is horrible. Then, someone like me comes along and trys to fix it. But then that user just reverts it. But hey, thats Wikipedia life. Cheers, —mikedk9109^SIGN 20:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sh!t does happen, and I just try to aviod it as much as possible. Trust me, you don't want to get into anything with anyone on here. —mikedk9109^SIGN 20:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've been through almost everything on here. haha. Well, it depends, what do you wanty your sig to like? Like mine, or completely custom? —mikedk9109^SIGN 21:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what do you want it to look like? Font, color, etc. —mikedk9109^SIGN

Here, hows this: Bmg916 —mikedk9109^SIGN 22:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you like that, then go to My preferences and paste this code in the sig box: [[User:Bmg916|<font color=#009900 face="Arial Black">Bmg916</font>]] Then check the "Raw signature" checkbox, click save, and your good to go. —mikedk9109^SIGN 22:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I was glad to help you.If you ever need anything else, just drop me a line. —mikedk9109^SIGN 01:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Amy Zidian

I asked at the WP:PW talk page. Peace, -- The Hyb rid 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian's Nicknames

Twice you've removed them by reverting edits. And the second edit you reverted included no Christian Coalition stable rumors. What's up with that? 209.247.22.151 01:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Forgot to mention: since I'm not registered and don't have a user page, you might wanna reply in the Jason Reso (Christian) article's talk page.209.247.22.151 01:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For you

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Know that your countless reverts of vandalism and making sure that wrestling articles are vandalism free do not go unnoticed. —mikedk9109^SIGN 01:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for signing my autograph book! Cheers, —mikedk9109^SIGN 00:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning vandals

Hi there, I just noticed that you warned a vandal on User talk:69.231.84.127 twice since his last act of vandalism - see his contribs. You can only warn a vandal once until he vandalises again, otherwise we might as well give a full set of warnings in one go... I can see that you do loads of vandal-fighting, so this just probably slipped by, but thought I'd mention it. ConDem^Talk 02:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. By the way, I often find that it gets a bit confusing when editors warn vandals for edits that somone else reverted. For example, I was just about to warn that user after my revert, then saw your warnings, and had to work out whether those warnings were for previous edits (and if so deserved a harsher warning) or whether they were for the new edits (in which case i didn't need to warn at all). I reckon that if we all stick to warning for the edits we reverted (unless its quite clear that the reverter isn't going to warn) then things get a lot less confusing! That sentence had so many sub-clauses, my head hurts. ConDem^Talk 02:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Bat Award

Thanks, but I don't deserve it. I haven't exactly been calm about anything involved in that dispute. While I appreciate the award, I'll have to turn you down. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 22:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there wouldn't really be any point in accepting it. Anyone who would look into the archives of that talk page would be able to see the truth. Like you said though, at least I'm honest. Thanks, -- The Hyb rid 02:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MVP/Ken Kennedy

Just like to give a quick thanks in correcting my mistakes on both MVP's and Ken Kennedy's articles. I was quick to jump to those conclusions whilst currently watch RAW. Again, thank you.--The Scourge 02:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:The Undertaker

The only reason I prefer the one currently being used is because it seems to at least have some evidence, whereas no matter how many places state 1962, none provides any evidence. Cheers, SteveLamacq43 14:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: McMahon vs. Trump

The match was announced on RAW this week and on WWE.com so it is not speculative information. Check it yourself at the official WrestleMania website. Cheers! -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are misinterpreting what WP:PW and Wikipedia policy states. The WP:PW warnings say not to add matches that have not been announced yet on US television or WWE.com. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this case the matches were announced on WWE.com and on RAW this week. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you should discuss this with other members of WP:PW in the project's talk page to see what they think. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet

Man you are annoying ok tell me what to do in order to get you off me. User:Damon88

Bobby Lashley

Why is everyone reverting the PPVs. I am covering the points and PPVs in the last paragraph. Can we at least keep it that way? You made that last paragraph loose worse. :( I have had enough of this stupid edit war. All points where covered, No Way Out was covered. Now you removed them all. So wrong, Govvy 19:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sheds a tear* :~( You're never know, he might have to retire next week! Then we would have to add it because of his short lived career! Govvy 19:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Lashley

Hey man thanks for your advice i will do just that. Damon88

Dominator

I have watched ECW since it first started and SmackDown for ages. They called it Dominator on SmackDown, they still refer to it as a Dominator on ECW a fair few times. Joey Styles clearly refers to that move as the Dominator when he uses it. Govvy 20:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re Fansites and MySpace pages

Will do. Damon88

Dominator

Ok i will fix it. Damon88

Bobby Lashley

Can i atleast put in real height on Bobby Lashley?

Ortiz

Okay. I am trying to figure out how to cite. I'm sorry that the encyclopedia has changed since the last time I was on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Now the cite that states the info is already on the page. He says this in the Baltimore Sun interview. I just don't know how to cite this. It would help if you could help me cite this or wait till I figure it out. Thanks!!!! User:MgHoneyBee.

As I told you before it is the Baltimore Sun interview.http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/bal-ortizqa1218,0,3366285.story?coll=bal-sports-headlines. I think there is more on the page than on the actual URL that I have. Sorry for the inconvenience and misunderstanding.User: MgHoneyBee

Thanks for the help. I think next time I'll have better luck in getting the info cited. Thanks again. User:MgHoneyBee

Pic

Hey buddy i was just wondering if this recently uploaded pic is appropriate?

File:Brock entrance.jpg

Brock Lesnar making his entrance.