Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Hate is disruptive
This essay itself, ironically, is disruptive, as people have been quoting it in assorted arguments around Wikipedia as though it's some sort of policy. Time for it to go away. Jtrainor (talk) 19:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, and TBAN filer from XfD. A cursory review of their recent nominations shows that the vast majority of what they nominate is kept, indicating a clear ignorance of things like BEFORE. Nominations seem to be solely WP:IDONTLIKEIT, and this is another example. Exactly zero evidence has been provided to support the nom's vague assertions it's "disruptive". How would you even know, Jtrainor, considering your last edit before this was in January? Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- You should probably read WP:AGF, as it's clear you have forgotten all about it. Jtrainor (talk) 20:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)