all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

Only items that receive a simple majority (50% +1 of the arbitrators electorate) "support" vote will be passed (until the arbitrators electorate change his mind)
Items that receive a simple majority (50% +1 of the arbitrators electorate) "oppose" vote will be formally rejected (until the arbitrators electorate change his mind).
Items that do not receive a simple majority (50% +1 of the arbitrators electorate) "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time. The arbitrators electorate cannot change its mind in this case, and the passed or rejected decision will be valid for ever.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, 0 Arbitrators are recused and 1 is inactive, so 6 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on.

Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on the discussion page.

Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Ban on editing deletion-related pages for duration of case

1) Due to a demonstrated tendency toward disruptive editing habits on voting-related pages, Iasson is prohibited from editing any deletion-related page for the duration of the case. Should he do so, he may be blocked for up to a week by an administrator. Determining what is "deletion-related" is left to the discretion of the blocking administrator.

Support:

Vote to take effect without delay. Neutrality^talk 06:04, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
Order sounds reasonable. Do give the normal 24 hours before enacting though. --mav 06:10, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Nohat 07:20, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Aye. -- Grun t 🇪🇺 15:17, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
➥the Epopt 16:21, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Fred Bauder 17:45, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
Ambi 23:37, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oppose:

(although I am not an arbitrator, I want my vote to be visible) Iasson 08:04, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Abstain:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

General

Motion to close

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.