Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusta Exchange
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:09, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:09, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Augusta Exchange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Reads like an advertisement, article fails to establish notability (having the largest movie theater in the area does not make it notable). Adrianwn (talk) 21:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Agreed, it reads like an advertisement, but that can be fixed. Should we delete every article about shopping malls that aren't notable? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Shopping_malls_by_country
--Abusing (talk) 03:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. —Dravecky (talk) 05:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as being a regional power center with significant press coverage (see [1]) does qualify it as notable and verifiable. The article needs expansion and better references but those are cleanup issues, not a reason for deletion. - Dravecky (talk) 11:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - In serious need of a cleanup, but enough WP:RS's present to satisfy Notability concerns. I also think that more could be gleaned out of the ref's provided than just a list of stores. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 11:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.