Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 10, 2007 anti-Israeli occupation protest
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:08, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:08, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- June 10, 2007 anti-Israeli occupation protest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Is a protest with 5000 people notable? There are no "big" media sources cited either. F 09:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Prodded before, prod removed.
- Delete First of all estimates range from 1000 people to 5000. Second, none of the sources are reliable in themselves since they are inherently POV. This is especially true for Indymedia. Unless someone can find some reliable secondary sources this should be deleted as news with no reliable secondary sources to establish notability. MartinDK 10:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Minor jolly for hard left SDS loonies with no long term significance. The writer obviously doesn't have a clue either. Gaza is only occupied by Hamas at the moment. Nick mallory 11:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS - No historic notability Corpx 15:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, Corpx, and MartinDK. Bearian 16:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as many protests with larger (much larger I mean) have no articles. If there was enough coverage, which I doubt because of the low number, it can be transwiki to Wikinews, although a very slim chance it will.--JForget 16:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.