Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Oldest Living Nobel Laureates
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:42, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:42, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Carlossuarez46 19:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of Oldest Living Nobel Laureates[edit]
- List of Oldest Living Nobel Laureates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I think this is in the "not a collection of indiscriminate information" area when we're making a list of a group of people by their current age Corpx 01:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT, as noted by nom. But how on earth did you find this? XD Giggy UCP 03:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of atheist Nobel laureates (2nd nomination) :) Corpx 03:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - recreation of recently AfD'd material in new (and improved) format (enough of a difference to negate speedy). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Noble Prize in Peace winners by longevity from May 2007. Flyguy649 talk contribs 04:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment is there a WikiAlmanac to transwiki this to? 70.55.91.131 08:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as listcruft.--JForget 17:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Indiscriminate, irrelevant. --Folantin 17:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as indiscriminate trivia. VanTucky (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vaguely defined trivia, lacking clear inclusion criteria. Wryspy 04:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Isn't it odd that we care more about old baseball players than we do old Nobel laureates? I think it's because these guys are already elderly by the time they get to Stockholm. Not a terribly interesting list. Cross-reference with list of atheist Nobel laureates to figure out which ones are not going to go to heaven. Mandsford 00:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.