Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Murphy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:48, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 23:48, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Both were musicians that were spawned off a television show, but checking their google hits, the majority of them date back to 2003-2004. Both hadnt really done anything notable since the Popstars Live tv show. But not have much knowledge on the two, I'm not sure whether those 2 pass the notability bar. NO VOTE -- Arnzy | Talk 01:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep both under our music notability guidelines. Both have had a top 100 hit in a large or medium size country namely Australia. From memory, I created the first version of the Kayne Taylor article. Capitalistroadster 01:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 01:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Captialistroadster. --Terence Ong 05:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep well known. --Masssiveego 05:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per Capitalistroadster. Cnwb 09:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above Computerjoe 10:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per all. --Siva1979Talk to me 14:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. --Cymsdale 15:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per all Bucketsofg 15:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above --† Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 19:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per all above. --AaronS 20:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep on the grounds of unanimous consensus; even the nom didn't express an opinion to delete. -ikkyu2 (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, no good reason not to. ProhibitOnions 20:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep you got that right --Khoikhoi 03:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems notable and look aboveNewyorktimescrossword 09:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, both are somewhat notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 23:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.