Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawa pind shonkia da
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:04, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nawa pind shonkia da (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable PhilB ~ T/C 20:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep All towns and villages are notable. Graeme Bartlett 20:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Problem A Google search (without the English-only filter on) brings back zero hits for that name. Additionally, the article seems to state (though I'm not sure) that it's just part of a town and not a town itself. So this a very cut-and-dried case: if someone can verify its existence as a town, it's a keeper. Otherwise, it's a delete...r. -- Mike (Kicking222) 20:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep you needed simply to search just for "Nawa Pind" which seems to be more common, I use google cache simply because it highlights the term to save me wading through, but it exists in a normal search too
- I was planning to move the article to have currect capitalization, and put in a redirect for the short name as requested on WP:AFC but when it appeared on AFD, I decided to leave it in in place till debate was over. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep you needed simply to search just for "Nawa Pind" which seems to be more common, I use google cache simply because it highlights the term to save me wading through, but it exists in a normal search too
[1] sources seem very brief although there are a few of them, we may need some Indian editors to turn up some other sources. But it seems mean to delete their village (which is known as a village.) Anyway, parts of a town are allowed as long as they have an identity of their own, (see Haight Ashbury Camden Town and numerous others) as from it's 'nickname' this village does. It seems a bit mean to delete it, which would seem as if it were just because we don't know it, whereas small bits of western towns/cities get in.Merkinsmum 21:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As long as they really exist, all towns and villages are notable regardless of size. --Oakshade (talk) 00:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.