Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pay per chat
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:55, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:55, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 01:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pay per chat[edit]
Already speedied once, as it was tied to advertising for AskPoodle.com, which seems to be the primary user of the term. Looks like Neologism with no Reliable Sources to indicate that it has become a notable term. Fan-1967 20:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Google searches for the terms it is compared with:
- Pay-per click: Over 3 million hits
- Pay-per call: Almost 900,000 hits
- Pay-per chat: About 1,700 hits
- Although unique results are not totally reliable once the total is over 1,000, the unique hits come to 64, many of which come back to AskPoodle.com. Fan-1967 20:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as notability is not asserted. I'm willing to change my vote if and when it is asserted, but I get the feeling that's not likely to happen. Aecis No running, shouting or piddling in the shallow end 22:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.