Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Exeter Cathedral Nave, Exeter, UK - Diliff.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2014 at 20:09:38 (UTC)

Reason: I believe each of the images could be featurable in their own right but work particularly well together to illustrate some of the significant architectural features of the cathedral.
Articles in which this image appears: Exeter Cathedral
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: User:Diliff

Support as nominator – Ðiliff «» (Talk) 20:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Another fifty image stitch? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the middle one of the choir is 50 images. The other two are 30 each. I guess that makes 110 for the set. ;-)Ðiliff «» (Talk) 19:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Very impressive...--Godot13 (talk) 04:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent work as usual. Nikhil (talk) 06:54, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course. About the only flaw is a small, unavoidable amount of perspective distortion near the edges. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 06:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support! J e e 17:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is an unexpected lack of symmetry with the Quire image. Was something preventing you from get dead centre? Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I always try to position the camera dead centre, but I find this slight lack of symmetry to be quite common in churches and cathedrals. Sometimes the altar or the middle of the aisle isn't aligned with the ceiling, or the quire is off centre. I'm not entirely sure what the source of the misalignment was in this image but it's probably off by a matter of 1-2cm at most. This is a very wide angle view (115 degrees horizontal field of view, roughly equivalent to a 14mm rectilinear lens), and any misalignment is exaggerated by the perspective in the corners. What I can see is that I am very close to being exactly in the middle of the the ribs on vaulted ceiling (there's no lean of this line which you would expect if I were off-centre relative to it). If the image is indeed centred on the vaulted ceiling, then I would have to assume that the quire and the arches behind it are imperfectly symmetrical and slightly shifted to camera right. Then again it might all be because I was just that 1-2cm off centre. I'm not sure. I don't think it's a huge issue though. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 22:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nor do I, but it was atypical for your work and that got me wondering. Thanks for the explanation. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Enthralling images. (And from what I've read in Rolf Toman's Gothic: Architecture, Sculpture, Painting, departures from strict symmetry are not unusual in historic Gothic churches.) Sca (talk) 21:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support That really wows me. -- Alborzagros (talk) 12:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Exeter Cathedral Nave, Exeter, UK - Diliff.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Exeter Cathedral Quire, Exeter, UK - Diliff.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Exeter Cathedral Lady Chapel, Exeter, UK - Diliff.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]