Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The American Nation
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:50, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:50, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 01:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The American Nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I'm not sure if a school textbook is notable in it's own right, there isn't much to say about the subject, and there is thousands of textbook out there without an article, and I don't see anything special about this textbook from the rest. Written by a banned user doesn't help nither. Non-notable in my opinion, so Delete Jaranda wat's sup 18:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 18:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete But for a moment I imagined kids flooding to add their textbooks to Wikipedia and actually reading them and obsessing over them like Pokemon species and episodes of Grey's Anatomy ... After coming out of my reverie I couldn't think of any textbook that would be notable unless it was the object of major litigation or contained a significant error and becomes news. Acroterion (talk) 19:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not that textbooks are unimportant, since they can reflect the biases of the authors (liberal or conservative) and of the school boards that buy their works. But this article has nothing to say. I like Acro's daydream... but this would open the doors for anyone to put a textbook on Wikipedia, and anyone who does that needs to get out more often. Mandsford 23:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete no content--SefringleTalk 05:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.