User talk:Canatoba

I an analytical, unbiased, and often serve as impartial moderator.

Empiricism is my belief so only evidence and logic serves as my opinion - nothing more

New Democratic Party

Do not delete comments that comply with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Further stunts like that would be grounds for vandalism.UBER ^(talk) 00:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I'll ask you again here, since you don't want to reply on the talk page. Where is your evidence that they are populist? I am awaiting your response.UBER ^(talk) 00:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry

This IP and this one have recently made similar edits as yourself and they both originate from Winnipeg, Manitoba. I will remind you that sockpuppetry is an offense that can get you banned in Wikipedia, so if you are abusing multiple IP accounts, I would urge you to stop right now before you dig yourself in a bigger hole.UBER ^(talk) 01:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine I will stop - I'll take your word for it http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20091125/ndp_hst_091125?hub=OttawaHome http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/energy/archive/2009/04/22/ndp-takes-another-hit-over-environment-policies.aspx http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0006398 http://www.filibustercartoons.com/Layton.htm Here are 4 sources

Two of those sources (Vancouver Sun blog and Canadian Encyclopedia) are not reliable. The first does not claim the party is populist, merely that they are using elements of populism. You might have a point with the fourth, but that doesn't warrant removing democratic socialism entirely from the infobox. I'd be fine if you want to include populism, but leave democratic socialism alone.UBER ^(talk) 01:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]