Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doggone Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doggone Records

A vanity label for a non notable artist. Not to be confused with a different defunct rock label from the 1980s/90s owned by Jefferson Holt (Flat Duo Jets, etc). None of the three artists signed have an allmusic entry. None of releases appear to have charted. Coverage limited to blogs and myspace. Fails WP:CORP Iam (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. [Google] brings up YouTube, Myspace and Wiki forks. Hazir (talk) 10:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 07:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:CORP. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Non-notable record label. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 22:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Note – The nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.