Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kashmircloud

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 18:05, 14 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kashmircloud}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Kashmircloud[edit]

  • Supporting evidence: Kashmircloud (talk · contribs) and the other listed accounts were blocked as per Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kashmircloud. Kashmircloud now claims that he/she has been wrongfully blocked. I think a check can shed some confusions, as there are some additional canvassing sock cases not fully resolved. Kashmircloud has given consent to checkuser, [1]. --Soman (talk) 19:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Careful here. The following are  Confirmed sock-puppets of the one editor;
  1. Casth7878 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Cast788 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Jimb56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. J-3b56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. Snowolfol4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  6. Jóhann Heiðar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Note, however that Kashmircloud (talk · contribs) is Red X Unrelated to the above editors - Alison 01:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
heh - it appear that Sam Korn came to the exact same conclusion - Alison 01:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The one account that was not yet blocked has now been. Tiptoety talk 01:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.