Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deric Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deric Williams

Previously included in a separate nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artbox, there was no consensus achieved on this article, so it is being relisted separately. The original nominator (User:Fnarf999) argued that the person did not satisfy the criteria at WP:BIO. bainer (talk) 03:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nn. Feezo (Talk) 03:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge worthwhile information into Artbox. While I'd like to see the article stay put, I can't come up with a convincing argument to do so. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 04:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:BIO. ॐ Metta Bubble ^puff 04:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This reads as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 08:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no "worthwhile information" here. He's the nephew of someone famous; he did marketing for a not-very-famous website, making him their, what, 100th most important employee? There's nothing here. My newspaper guy is as notable. Fnarf999 01:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Artbox, all notability appears to be tied up with that band. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.