Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tits
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:28, 16 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:28, 16 March 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 22:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete absolutely no evidence that this meets notability criteria.Deproded by author without comment--Porturology 19:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Funny name though. Aplomado - UTC 20:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC --lightdarkness (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn band. Maybe they were hoping to slip by based on the fact that you can get about a billion google results for "tits" ;-) Fan1967 22:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I googled this and got about a billion hits! Surely we have to keep it. Oh ... oh yeah. What Fan1967 said. I guess WP:MUSIC isn't met, then. Delete. Colonel Tom 00:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. --MaNeMeBasat 07:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the dab Tits, as redirects are cheap and a possible search term. No objection to deleting history first. youngamerican (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.