Jump to content

Kyriakos Pittakis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by UndercoverClassicist (talk | contribs) at 21:59, 21 April 2023 (We can do without an image of the Beulé Gate, since it now has its own page.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kyriakos Pittakis
Κυριακός Πιττάκης
Black-and-white photograph of a middle-aged man, facing the camera.
Kyriakos Pittakis, around 1850
Born1798
Athens, Greece
Died1863 (aged 64–65)
OccupationArchaeologist
EmployerGreek Archaeological Service
Known forFirst Greek Ephor-General of Antiquities; restoration of the Acropolis of Athens.
TitleEphor General (1843–1863)

Kyriakos S. Pittakis or Pittakys (Greek: Κυριακός Πιττάκης) (1798–1863) was a Greek archaeologist of the 19th century. He is most notable as the first Greek Ephor General of Antiquities of Greece, the head of the Greek Archaeological Service, and for his role in the conservation and restoration of monuments on the Acropolis of Athens. He has been described as a "dominant figure in Greek archaeology for 27 years",[1] and as "one of the most important epigraphers of the nineteenth century".[2]

One of the few native Greeks active in Greek archaeology during the late Ottoman period and the early years of the Kingdom of Greece, Pittakis played an influential role in the early years of the Greek Archaeological Service and the Archaeological Society of Athens. He was responsible for much of the early excavation and restoration of the Acropolis, including attempts to restore the Erechtheion, the Parthenon, the Temple of Athena Nike and the Propylaia. As ephor of the Central Public Museum for Antiquities from 1836, and later as Ephor General, he was largely responsible for the conservation and protection of many of the monuments and artefacts then known from Ancient Greece.

Pittakis was prolific both as an excavator and as an archaeological writer, publishing by his own estimation more than 4,000 inscriptions. He has been praised for his extensive efforts to uncover and protect Greece's classical heritage, particularly in Athens and the adjacent islands, but criticised for his unsystematic and incautious approach. His reconstructions of ancient monuments often placed aesthetics over fidelity to the original, and were largely reverted after his death. He has also been accused of allowing his strong nationalist beliefs to influence his reconstruction of ancient monuments, and of distorting the archaeological record to suit his own beliefs.

Early life

Pittakis was born in Athens in 1798.[3] His family origins are obscure: he was likely from a humble background.[4] A contemporary described him as having been born "beneath a forgotten cornice of the Acropolis … which protectively sheltered his cradle."[5] He seems to have been largely self-taught in archaeology,[6] but became apprenticed around the age of sixteen to the French vice-consul Louis-François-Sébastien Fauvel,[6] sometimes called the "Father of Archaeology in Greece".[7] During this period, he established his interest in epigraphy, copying inscriptions from the Acropolis and concealing moveable antiquities from Ottoman forces, who then occupied Greece.[6] He was also supported in his early archaeological work by the Philomousos Hetaireia (Greek: Φιλόμουσος Εταιρεία, lit.'Society of Lovers of the Muses'), a learned society with a particular interest in antiquities.[8]

Pittakis is said to have met and befriended Lord Byron during the latter's visits to Athens in 1809–1810.[8] Teresa Makri, the sister of Pittakis' wife Aiketerini,[9][10] is generally considered the inspiration for the "Maid of Athens" of Byron's 1811 poem.[11][a]

Greek War of Independence

A painting of the 1821 siege of the Acropolis, in which Pittakis participated, by Panagiotis Zographos

After growing tensions and preparations throughout the early months of 1821, the Greek War of Independence began in March 1821. When rebel villagers from Attica entered the city on behalf of the revolutionaries in April, the Turkish garrison retreated to the Acropolis. Ottoman forces briefly recaptured the city in July, but largely departed in August, leaving only a small force behind, whereupon the population rebelled again, forcing the Turks back to the Acropolis and beginning the First Siege of the Acropolis, which would continue until 10 June.[12]

Pittakis was a member of the Filiki Eteria (Greek: Φιλικὴ Ἑταιρεία, lit.'Friendly Society'), a nationalist secret society formed to oppose Ottoman rule in Greece.[13] He was present in Athens during 1821–1822, and a member of the irregular Greek force that besieged and eventually retook the Acropolis.[14] He may have witnessed, or participated in, the massacre of several hundred Turkish prisoners from the siege in June 1822:[15][b] his mentor Fauvel, the French vice-consul, sheltered some of the survivors in his own home until the arrival of two French warships allowed their evacuation.[17]

Pittakis later claimed credit for the 1821 rediscovery of the klepsydra, an ancient spring on the Acropolis, which ensured a fresh water supply to the Greek forces who occupied the site between 1822 and 1827.[18] However, the discovery was also claimed by the Greek military leader Odysseas Androutsos and by the Swiss scholar Felix Stähelin, and is likely to have originally been accidental.[18] During his service in 1822, he acquired the manuscript of the Chronicle of Anthimos, a history of Athens written by Ioannis Venizelos, which Pittakis would eventually publish in 1853.[19] He also spent time on the islands of Aegina and Salamis during 1821–1822, where he recorded several inscriptions that had been moved there from Athens on account of the fighting.[20]

For his service in the War of Independence, he was later awarded a 'certificate of patriotism' by the Athenian city government.[21] His brother was killed and buried on the Acropolis during the war,[2] either during the first siege or the second, which took place in 1826–1827.

During and after the war, Pittakis corresponded with the British architect Thomas Leverton Donaldson, sharing with him news of archaeological discoveries to which scholars outside Greece no longer had access.[22]

Portrait of Odysseas Androutsos, c.1870

Reputed 'columns for cannonballs' exchange

According to a much-cited anecdote,[23] during the siege of the Acropolis, the Ottoman occupiers began to run low on lead ammunition, and began to destroy the marble columns of the Parthenon in order to remove the lead clamps which held them together.[21] Pittakis, in an effort to preserve the ancient temple, is said to have offered to send ammunition to the Turkish defenders, as long as they left the columns intact.[14] The laconic phrase "here are bullets, do not touch the columns!" is often associated with the alleged incident.[24]

The story is most likely apocryphal.[25][26] It is first attested in an 1859 letter by the writer Aristotelis Valaoritis, in which the protagonist is named as Odysseas Androutsos, who only arrived in Athens two months after the Acropolis was retaken;[27] contemporary reports from the siege indicate that the Greeks themselves fired artillery on the Acropolis ruins.[27] The story was first connected with Pittakis by his friend and rival Alexandros Rizos Rangavis in his eulogy for Pittakis after the latter's death in 1863.[14] James Beresford has suggested that the origin, or at least the popularity, of the anecdote may lie in the growth in power of the Megali Idea, a nationalist ideology calling for the 'return' of Classical Greek lands to the modern Greek state, in the mid-19th century, and the desire to strengthen the perceived links between modern Greeks and the heritage of Ancient Greece.[28]

The story has, however, been described as a "powerful myth"[29] with a prominent place in the Greek national discourse,[24] particularly around the debate over the restitution of the Elgin marbles.[23] It has been referenced by the Greek Minister of Culture Melina Mercouri and the archaeologist Manolis Andronikos as historical fact,[26] in an effort to argue for the sculptures' return.[26]

Archaeological career

The grave stele of Phainippe (c.400–390 BCE), found by Pittakis on Aegina in early 1829[21]

Between 1824 and 1828, Pittakis studied medicine[30] at the Ionian Academy on Corfu[31]—a common field of study for Greek intellectuals of the time, as legal, philological and architectural training were difficult for them to come by except in northern Europe.[32] According to the archaeological historian Vasileios Petrakos, it was on Corfu that he met his wife, Aikaterini, a fellow native of Athens.[30] During his studies, he continued his archaeological work, returning in 1825–1826 to Salamis to transcribe and catalogue further inscriptions.[20]

In 1828, he unsuccessfully petitioned Ioannis Kapodistrias, who had become Greece's first independent head of state in 1827, for an archaeological post.[30] He returned to Athens, where he resumed his early work of collecting inscriptions, sending several to the German scholar August Böckh for inclusion in the Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum.[30] He gathered antiquities from the Church of Megali Panagia, which was built on the former site of Hadrian's Library.[21] He excavated on Salamis and Aegina in early 1829, and sent several objects to Andreas Moustoxydis, the director of Greece's national archaeological museum (then based on Aegina), for display.[21]

In 1832, he was appointed to the unpaid role of 'custodian of the antiquities in Athens' (Greek: ἐπιστάτης τῶν ἐν Ἀθήναις ἀρχαιοτήτων),[30] in which capacity he gave tours of the Acropolis to foreign visitors: one of whom was the American author and poet Nathaniel Parker Willis, who recalled being shown Byron's graffito of his own name on one of the columns of the Erechtheion.[33] Pittakis was appointed 'sub-ephor' (Greek: ὑποέφορος) of Central Greece, reporting to the Bavarian architect Adolf Weissenberg,[34] in 1833,[30] making him among the first native Greeks employed by the archaeological service.[c][35] Now empowered to do so, he carried out his first formal works on the Acropolis, demolishing Frankish and Turkish remains in central part of the Propylaia and its north-east hall, known as the pinakotheke.[36] He also began to collect together some of the scattered antiquities from the site,[30] many of which were the remains of bombardments during the Acropolis' two recent sieges.[37] He also carried out the first excavations around the Parthenon, clearing its surroundings of medieval and early modern buildings,[38] and recovering parts of the Parthenon frieze.[39]

The Propylaia on the Acropolis of Athens. The pinakotheke can be seen on the left.

On 18 August 1834, by a royal decree issued on the advice of the Bavarian architect Leo von Klenze, the Bavarian military garrison was dismissed from the Acropolis and the area declared an archaeological site.[40] Despite Pittakis' existing status as 'custodian' of its antiquities and the fact that Athens fell under the jurisdiction of his sub-ephorate, he was not selected to carry out the restoration work:[39] instead, the task went to Ludwig Ross, a German scholar and favourite of the Bavarian-born King Otto,[41] who was recommended by Klenze directly.[42] Ross worked mostly alongside architects from northern Europe, particularly the Prussian Eduard Schaubert, the Danish Christian Hansen and the Saxon Eduard Laurent, an architect from Dresden.[42][43] The dominance of non-Greek scholars in the excavation and conservation of Greek monuments provoked resentment from the native Greek intelligentsia, and tensions between Pittakis and Ross.[4]

In 1835, Pittakis published his first monograph in French,[44] on the topography and ruins of Athens. The work made extensive use of epigraphy, including (as Pittakis claimed) over 800 then-unpublished inscriptions,[45] and has been described as the first epigraphical work written by an ethnic Greek.[46] In this volume, he published the discovery of several Ionic column capitals in the wall of the Church of the Agia Kyra Kandili near the Choragic Monument of Lysicrates, along with a dedication to Hestia, which he took to indicate an ancient temple. Modern scholarship has suggested that these were part of the shrine known as the Prytaneion, containing the sacred fire of Hestia seen as the heart of the political community, whose original location is lost.[47] In 1836, on Ross's resignation as Ephor General,[48] Pittakis was appointed ephor of the Central Public Museum for Antiquities,[21] which was housed in various ancient structures around Athens[d] until the construction of the Acropolis Museum in 1874.[49] This made him the most senior archaeologist employed by the Greek Archaeological Service, and its de facto head.[50]

Archaeological Society of Athens

Floor plan of the Erechtheion.

In 1837, Pittakis led the foundation of the Archaeological Society of Athens, alongside Rangavis, the Education Minister Iakovos Rizos Neroulos and the philanthropist Konstantinos Bellios.[51] Where both Rangavis, Neroulos and Bellios were wealthy Phanariots (a class of mostly-wealthy Greek merchants from Istanbul, who had enjoyed special privileges in the administration of the Ottoman Empire),[52][4] Pittakis was unusual in the new society in being both Athenian and of a humble background, a factor which created tension between him and the other elites of the Society.[4] The Society held its first meeting on 28 April 1837, in the Parthenon.[53]

The Archaeological Society aimed to support the Greek Archaeological Service, which had minimal financial and human resources, in conserving, studying and excavating the monuments of Greece.[54] Along with Rangavis, Pittakis launched and edited the periodical Archaeological Journal (Greek: Αρχαιολογική Εφημερίς), one of the society's main publications.[55] Rangavis soon resigned as co-editor, leaving Pittakis as effectively the sole writer of the journal until 1860.[55][56]

From 1837, Pittakis, assisted by the Swiss sculptor Heinrich Max Imhof and Ross' former collaborators Schaubert and Laurent, carried out restoration work in the Society's name on the Acropolis.[36] He began in the Erechtheion, a building he described as having "fallen down",[57] throughout 1837–1840,[58] where he reconstructed the naos using modern bricks to replace areas of fallen stonework. He also extended the height of some collapsed columns[59] and rearranged surviving fragments of the building to emphasise the best preserved.[60] During the reconstruction, one of the south porch's Caryatids, which had fallen during the fighting of the War of Independence, was found and returned to its plinth.[61] Pittakis also excavated the building, down to the floor level of its phase as a Christian church, uncovering tombs in the southern part and a cistern in the western area.[62]

Two paintings showing the effect of Pittakis' restorations of the Erechtheion: left, by Edward Dodwell in 1821, ; right, by Christian Hansen in 1845.

From 1841, he began to collaborate with Rangavis (now secretary of the Archaeological Society)[61] on the restoration of the Parthenon, having previously excavated its pronaos in the late 1830s.[36] Between 1841 and 1844, they rebuilt parts of the naos and restored part of the north and south colonnades.[61] As he had in the Erechtheion, Pittakis reinforced part of the Parthenon's north side with a large brick wall.[60] He ordered casts from the British Museum to replace the Parthenon sculptures taken by Lord Elgin in the early 19th century,[63] placing them directly onto the Parthenon itself. [64] Pittakis intended to rebuilt the entire north colonnade, but was prevented from doing so by lack of funds.[65] On behalf of the Archaeological Society, he excavated at Mycenae in 1841, clearing the approach to the Lion Gate and making a tentative exploration of the Tomb of Clytemnestra.[66][67] In 1842, Pittakis was placed in charge of all excavation on the Acropolis.[60]

Ephor General of Antiquities (1843-1863)

An 1830 painting of the Parthenon before Pittakis' restorations, by Pierre Peytier. The Parthenon mosque, demolished by Pittakis, is visible to the right.

Pittakis had a long-running feud with Ludwig Ross, Greece's Ephor General of Antiquities from 1834,[68] which reflected wider tensions between native Greek archaeologists and the mostly-Bavarian scholars who, on the invitation of King Otto, dominated Greek archaeology in the first years of the independent state.[4] In 1834 and 1835, excavations in the Piraeus uncovered a series of inscriptions known as the 'Naval Records',[69] which gave information on the administration and financing of the Athenian navy between the 5th and 4th centuries BCE.[70] Ross studied the inscriptions and sent sketches to August Boeckh for the Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum, despite having not yet received approval to publish them.[69] The Greek authorities asserted that Ross' actions were illegal: Pittakis attacked Ross in the press, forcing Ross' resignation as Ephor General in 1836.[71] Nikolaos Papazarkadas has argued that Pittakis' opposition to Ross' actions was personal rather than principled, pointing out that Pittakis made no protest against the copying of several thousand Greek inscriptions by French epigraphers from 1843 onwards, a project supported by the Prime Minister, Ioannis Kolettis.[71]

In 1843, Pittakis was appointed to Ross' former post as Ephor General of Antiquities, which he held until his death in 1863.[48] One of his first actions, in 1843, was to complete Ross' attempted demolition of the Parthenon mosque, which had been partially destroyed during the War of Independence.[72] He continued to curate Athens' archaeological collections, writing an 1843 guidebook in which he claimed that around 400 of the 615 objects exhibited in the Temple of Hephaestus had been collected "as a result of [his] endeavour and passion".[21] He also continued to excavate on the Acropolis, completing in 1843–1844 with Rangavis the restoration of the Temple of Athena Nike, and uncovering two portions of the Parthenon frieze in 1845.[73] He returned to the Temple of Athena Nike in 1846–1847 to install casts replacing parts of its frieze, which had been removed and taken to the British Museum.[74]

One of Pittakis' priorities was to protect the antiquities on the Acropolis from looting and damage.[75] He hired watchmen to ensure that none of the site's scattered, fragmentary remains were picked up by visitors.[76] Between 1847 and 1853, he arranged for the archaeological fragments scattered around the Acropolis to be collected, fixed into plaster[77] and built into so-called 'walls' or 'panels' (Greek: πίνακες, romanized: pinakes).[31] He also established collections of antiquities in the major monuments of the site,[75] most of which were in locked storerooms to which only he had keys, and to which nobody was permitted access except in his presence.[78] A substantial problem was the habit of visitors, especially sailors from the harbour of Piraeus, of chipping away pieces from the ancient structures, particularly the Erechtheion:[79] to combat this, Pittakis had the whole temple clad in a protective layer of stone.[77]

Photograph of a wall haphazardly made from stone and marble antiquities.
One of Pittakis' pinakes on the Acropolis, constructed from the fragmentary remains of various antiquities (here mostly Byzantine), photographed c. 1868–1875.

From 1850, Pittakis undertook significant work in and around the Propylaea. That year, he cleared and partially reconstructed[64] the steps approaching the monument.[80] Pittakis enlisted Charles Ernest Beulé, a French archaeologist of the French School at Athens, to assist with the removal of medieval and modern structures from the remaining parts of the Propylaea in 1852.[81] Beulé, against the prevailing scholarly opinion at the time, believed that Mnesikles, the architect of the Propylaia, had originally constructed a second gateway, and secured Pittakis' blessing as well as support from Alexandre de Forth-Rouen, the French ambassador to Greece, to investigate his hypothesis.[82] On 4 May, the excavators discovered additional steps leading towards the gate, and by 17 May it had become clear that they had found the edge of a fortified wall around the Acropolis, and within it a late Roman gateway, which became known as the Beulé Gate.[83] The site was visited by King Otto and Queen Amalia, and the discovery made Beulé's scholarly reputation.[83] Towards the end of the excavation, Beulé used explosives to blast through a particularly difficult block of mortar—a decision criticised by contemporary archaeologists, as well as the Greek newspapers, one of which had previously accused Beulé of wanting to blow up everything on the Acropolis.[84] Pittakis, who had been watching the operation, was almost struck by a fragment of the debris which pierced his hat:[85] reports circulated in the aftermath that he had been killed.[84] In 1854, Pittakis reconstructed the western part of the podium of the pinakotheke on the Propylaia's north-eastern side, which was in danger of collapsing.[64]

In 1851, on the resignation of Rangavis, Pittakis became secretary of the Archaeological Society of Athens, a post which he held until 1859.[86] In April 1854, on the outbreak of the Crimean War, British and French troops occupied the Piraeus with the aim of preventing Greece from assisting the Russian Empire against Ottoman Turkey.[87] The occupation led to an outbreak of cholera, which lasted from June 1854 to January 1855 and killed around 3,000 people,[88] including the Archaeological Society's president, Georgios Gennadios.[89] The situation meant that archaeological work was effectively impossible,[90] and led to a financial crisis within the Archaeological Society which meant that it effectively ceased to exist,[89] though Pittakis continued writing and publishing the Archaeological Journal, until 1858.[91] Between 1851 and 1858, in the judgement of Vasileios Petrakos, Pittakis was effectively the sole figure in both the Archaeological Society and Greek archaeology.[92] When Pittakis wrote to the Ministry of Education in October 1855, informing them of Gennadios' death and requesting approval to call a meeting to reconstitute the society, he received no response.[89] In 1858, the Minister for Education, Charalampos Christopoulos, asked Pittakis to reform the society and hold elections for new officials. These took place in the second half of the year: Pittakis was elected as secretary,[89] a position which he handed over the following year to Stefanos Koumanoudis.[91]

An 1857 photograph of the Propylaia, showing its state in the years immediately after Pittakis' restorations.

During his time as Ephor General, Pittakis excavated on Anafi, recording monuments and collecting inscriptions.[93] He also advocated for the demolition of the Frankish Tower, a medieval fortification built into the Propylaia, which would eventually be demolished in 1874.[94] Between 1856 and 1860, he carried out further clearing on the Acropolis in preparation for the construction of a museum, which would eventually be begun in 1865.[58] At this point, he considered the excavation of the Acropolis 'complete', since the excavations had reached bedrock in the 'main' area between the Parthenon, the Erechtheion and the Propylaia, and most of the post-Classical structures on the site had been removed.[58] He also excavated in Athens' lower town, including the Odeon of Herodes Atticus in 1848–1858, in which he found calcined remains of pieces of cedar wood,[95] which have been taken as evidence for the Odeon's original wooden roof.[96] He also uncovered a large bomb, which was interpreted as a remnant of the artillery fired under Francesco Morosini during the Venetian siege of the Acropolis in 1687.[97]

In 1860, he published his final edition of the Archaeological Journal, in which he claimed to have published a total of 4,158 inscriptions, "freely and for no compensation … merely moved by my yearning desire for the ancestral relics … [for] the common benefit and the dissemination to the ends of the world of every Greek letter, for the sake of Greek glory".[98]

The later part of Pittakis' career as Ephor General saw the discovery, in 1861, of the Kerameikos cemetery.[54] He died in Athens in 1863.[99] Rangavis, with whom he had quarrelled over his approach to restorations[100] and over his handling of the 'Naval Records' affair,[71] delivered the eulogy at his funeral, in which he praised Pittakis' devotion to the Classical past and did much to establish his reputation as a patriot and protector of Greece's antiquities.[101]

Legacy

The reception of Pittakis' work and impact on Greek archaeology has been polarised.[13] He has been praised as the first Greek scholar to make substantial use of epigraphy in reconstructing the Classical past,[13] for his efforts in preserving objects and the texts of inscriptions which would otherwise have been lost,[102] and for his energetic approach to the excavation and conservation of Greece's ancient monuments.[103] His published work remains an important source for the study of Athenian history and epigraphy.[46]

At the same time, Pittakis' epigraphical work has been criticised for its lack of scholarly rigour,[46] for Pittakis' errors in his knowledge of historical and literary sources,[102] and for the inaccuracy with which he reconstructed or interpreted certain texts.[3][46] His reconstructions of Athenian monuments have also been criticised for their haphazard methods, and for the licence with which Pittakis removed post-Classical structures and reorganised ancient remains.[104] Doubts have also been raised as to Pittakis' scholarly integrity, particularly concerning matters pertaining to Greek nationalism.[99]

In November 2013, a colloquium in Pittakis' memory was held at the Epigraphical Museum in Athens, entitled 'Light upon the Stones' (Greek: Επί πέτρας λευκής).[105]

Nationalism

As a young man, Pittakis was a member of the nationalist Filiki Eteria,[13] and expressed Greek nationalist views throughout his life.[106] The Archaeological Society of Athens, which he helped to found and in which he played a leading role until 1859,[92] has been described as "an intransigent ideological exponent of pure Classicism throughout the 19th century",[107] and as both "elitist" and "archaistic".[4]

"It is sacred work to concern oneself with the monuments of the Ancient Greeks, and to repair and reconstruct them."
Pittakis, quoted in Mallouchou-Tufano 1994, p. 73

Reflecting in 1836 on his experience of archaeology before the War of Independence, he wrote of his "fear of the Turks", and the haste with which he was forced to carry out his informal archaeological work on the Acropolis during the occupation.[3] In support of his excavations of the Athenian Agora in the area of Vrysaki, Pittakis claimed that all but 60 houses in Athens had been destroyed by the Turks, a figure questioned by modern studies.[108] Pittakis' accounts of the Turks' indifferent or destructive attitude to antiquities have been interpreted as part of a commonplace in pre-revolutionary Greece, where the Ottomans were presented as religious zealots liable to destroy Greek monuments:[109] an argument which has been called "overstated"[109] in modern times, but which was used in the 19th century as a "colonial tool"[110] to justify the removal of antiquities to European collections and, after independence, to justify the demolition of Ottoman remains by presenting them as of little value compared with the 'authentic' Classical remains beneath them.[111]

"Whoever at any time ascended that sacred hill was almost certain to meet the indefatigable archaeological guard, or his inscriptions, pilgrims and the students of his mysteries … Strangers, who came from all over the earth as pious pilgrims to the hill of the ancient miracles, ascending by the thousands every year, always found there among them the vigilant ephor, and used to associate him with the relics of those ancients."
Rangavis' eulogy for Pittakis, 1863, quoted on the cover of Matthiou and Pallis 2021.

From 1836 onwards, he continually obstructed and frustrated British efforts to obtain plaster casts of the Parthenon sculptures still stored on the Acropolis, which Charles Newton, the Keeper of the British Museum, complained had left the sculptures there "as leaves torn out of a manuscript are to the book itself."[112]

In 1852, Pittakis published a series of articles entitled 'Materials to be used to prove that the current inhabitants of Greece are descendants of the Ancient Greeks'.[113] In these papers, he attempted to find analogues in Classical literary sources for popular phrases and practices of his own time. His analysis in these articles has been criticised for assuming that the conclusion was self-evident, and offering little analysis or criticism of the sources beyond a face-value reading.[114] When the German scholar Jakob Fallmerayer argued in 1830 that the Greek population had been totally replaced during the Early Medieval period by Slavic migration,[99] Pittakis showed him false manuscripts intended to discredit his hypothesis.[115]

Criticism

Alexandros Rizos Rangavis, photographed in 1869 — variously Pittakis' colleague, collaborator, critic and eulogist.

Pittakis's lack of philological education and theoretical archaeological knowledge limited the effectiveness of his scholarship and restorations.[116] His work has been described as "empirical" rather than systematic,[60] and was often characterised by a failure to keep records of what he had removed, particularly of remains later than the Classical period.[64] In particular, Ludwig Ross criticised his clearing work in the Propylaea for failing to make any record of the later buildings he demolished.[64] He was further criticised in the contemporary press for his practice of building pinakes by setting various antiquities into plaster, which often broke up ensembles or presented artefacts of different periods and provenances together,[102] and by British contemporaries for his practice of storing antiquities away from public view, denying most scholars access to them.[78] His unsystematic record-keeping meant that he often published the same object or inscription multiple times, sometimes giving contradictory accounts of the date and place of its discovery,[102] or recorded finds without giving their proper context.[117]

Pittakis' collaborator, Alexandros Rizos Rangavis, later described his approach to restoration as "unmethodical and by chance",[60] and it was generally poorly received by both Greek and foreign observers.[79] He has been criticised for undertaking restoration work with little prior study or documentation of the buildings,[60] and for reconstructing both the Parthenon and the Erechtheion to place better-preserved items of masonry in more prominent positions, regardless of the original construction.[60] His use of modern bricks where anastylosis could not be carried out as has been described as "amateurish".[60] During his reconstruction of the Parthenon, he filled missing portions of the Doric columns with cylindrical brickwork, ignoring the fluting characteristic of the style.[60] Fani Mallouchou-Tufano has described his restorative work as characterised by "enthusiasm … innocence, naivity and ignorance",[118] pointing to his use of improvised material, including tree trunks, to restore the orthostates of the Erechtheion,[118] as well as to a story reported by Rangavis of Pittakis' improvised repair to a column of the Propylaia, using a large hand saw, which almost caused the collapse of the structure and left the saw itself stuck inside the column until its removal in 2003.[119] The negative reaction to his restorations, particularly in the Parthenon and Erechtheion, has been credited with inspiring the significant changes in approach adopted when the next major phase of the Acropolis' reconstruction began at the end of the 19th century, under Nikolaos Balanos.[65] Many of Pittakis' restorations were reverted during subsequent phases of conservation on the site.[120]

Two contemporary paintings showing the effect of Pittakis' clearing of the Lion Gate at Mycenae: left, by Edward Dodwell in 1821, before Pittakis' 1841 intervention; right, by Théodose du Moncel in 1845.

The later archaeologist of Mycenae, Spyridon Iakovidis [Wikidata], described Pittakis' work at the site as "half-hearted" in comparison to the excavations of Heinrich Schliemann and Christos Tsountas later in the century.[67] His epigraphic publications have been criticised for their lack of scholarly rigour, particularly in comparison to the contemporary work of Rangavis, who provided detailed information about the find-spot of each inscription, as well as a full transliteration and French translation.[46]

Nikolaos Papazarkadas has argued that many criticisms of Pittakis' integrity date to his feud with Ross, particularly the circumstances of the latter's resignation in 1836, and are probably "unfounded … [though] even in recent times some scholars ... uncritically replicat[e] largely-unfair accusations that go back to the nineteenth century."[71] It was during this conflict that August Böckh, Ross and Pittakis' mutual collaborator as the editor of the Corpus Inscriptionum Graecorum, accused Pittakis of breaking inscriptions before sending them to him, so as to increase the payment Pittakis would receive for finding them.[69]

Footnotes

Explanatory notes

  1. ^ Some primary sources incorrectly suggest that Pittakis was married to Teresa: see for instance Förster 1854, p. 21.
  2. ^ The precise number of Turkish captives killed is unclear: estimates vary from 400 to around 600.[16]
  3. ^ Another Greek, Ioannis Kokkonis, was hired at the same time as Pittakis, as sub-ephor for the Aegean Islands.[34]
  4. ^ From 1835, the collection was housed in the Temple of Hephaestus (then known as the Theseion); in 1837 it was moved to the Stoa of Hadrian in Hadrian's Library, in 1841 to the office of the Ephor General of Antiquities, and from 1843 it was displayed in the Tower of the Winds.[49]

References

  1. ^ Petrakos 2011, p. 135.
  2. ^ a b Constantakopoulou 2008, p. 297.
  3. ^ a b c Tsouli 2020, p. 267.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Voutsaki 2003, p. 245.
  5. ^ The French historian Jean Alexandre Bouchon, 1840/1841, quoted in Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 42
  6. ^ a b c Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 42.
  7. ^ Hellmann, Fraisse & Jacques 1982, p. 27.
  8. ^ a b Dyson 2008, p. 74.
  9. ^ Buxton Whalley 1851, p. 68.
  10. ^ Tomlinson 2021, p. 120.
  11. ^ Jenkins 1953, p. 200.
  12. ^ Arnaoutoglou 2008, p. 203.
  13. ^ a b c d Papazarkadas 2014, p. 401.
  14. ^ a b c Beresford 2016, p. 908.
  15. ^ Beresford 2016, p. 923.
  16. ^ Beresford 2016, p. n.53, with bibliography..
  17. ^ Beresford 2016, pp. 923–924.
  18. ^ a b St. Clair 2022, p. 271.
  19. ^ Merry 2004, p. 74.
  20. ^ a b Papadopoulos 2021, p. 115.
  21. ^ a b c d e f g Tsouli 2020, p. 268.
  22. ^ Dyson 2008, p. 71.
  23. ^ a b Beresford 2016, p. 903.
  24. ^ a b Beresford 2016, p. 916.
  25. ^ Beresford 2016, p. 926.
  26. ^ a b c Van Rookhuijzen 2021, p. 349.
  27. ^ a b Beresford 2016, p. 906.
  28. ^ Beresford 2016, pp. 911–912.
  29. ^ Beard 2010, p. 95.
  30. ^ a b c d e f g Petrakos 2011, p. 136.
  31. ^ a b Tsouli 2021.
  32. ^ Helm 2000, p. 8.
  33. ^ St. Clair 2022, p. 125.
  34. ^ a b Petrakos 2011, p. 57.
  35. ^ Greenberg & Hamilakis 2022, p. 22.
  36. ^ a b c Mallouchou-Tufano 1994, p. 72.
  37. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 1994, p. 71.
  38. ^ Petrakos 2007, p. 27.
  39. ^ a b Tomlinson 1991, p. 10.
  40. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 38.
  41. ^ Junker 1995, p. 755.
  42. ^ a b Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 40.
  43. ^ Dyer 1873, p. 373.
  44. ^ Pittakis 1835.
  45. ^ Pittakis 1835, quoted in Papazarkadas 2014, p. 402.
  46. ^ a b c d e Papazarkadas 2014, p. 402.
  47. ^ Schmalz 2006, p. 50.
  48. ^ a b Petrakos 2011, p. 59.
  49. ^ a b Tsouli 2020, p. 269.
  50. ^ Petrakos 2011, p. 134.
  51. ^ Dyson 2008, p. 75.
  52. ^ Pizanias 2020, p. 175.
  53. ^ Jenkins 1990, p. 91.
  54. ^ a b Petrakos 2007, p. 22.
  55. ^ a b Petrakos 2007, p. 21.
  56. ^ Petrakos 1987, pp. 192–193.
  57. ^ St. Clair 2022, p. 372.
  58. ^ a b c Mallouchou-Tufano 1994, p. 73.
  59. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 1998, p. 367.
  60. ^ a b c d e f g h i Lambrinou 2016, p. 531.
  61. ^ a b c Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 43.
  62. ^ Casanaki & Mallouchou 1985, p. 14.
  63. ^ Smith 2020, p. 154.
  64. ^ a b c d e Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 44.
  65. ^ a b Lambrinou 2012, p. 52.
  66. ^ Moore, Rowlands & Karadimas 2014, p. 1.
  67. ^ a b Iakovidis 2005, p. 163.
  68. ^ Athanassoglou-Kallmyer 2008, p. 12.
  69. ^ a b c Papazarkadas 2014, p. 403.
  70. ^ Gabrielsen 2014, pp. 39–40.
  71. ^ a b c d Papazarkadas 2014, p. 404.
  72. ^ Neils 2005, p. 324.
  73. ^ Jenkins 1990, p. 92.
  74. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 1994, p. 74.
  75. ^ a b Mallouchou-Tufano 1994, p. 46.
  76. ^ St. Clair 2022, pp. 452–453.
  77. ^ a b Tsouli 2020, p. 272.
  78. ^ a b Jenkins 1990, p. 93.
  79. ^ a b Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 46.
  80. ^ Dickins 2014, p. 1.
  81. ^ St. Clair 2022, pp. 490–491.
  82. ^ Baelen 1958, p. 95.
  83. ^ a b Baelen 1958, p. 97.
  84. ^ a b Baelen 1958, p. 98.
  85. ^ St. Clair 2022, pp. 491.
  86. ^ Coulson 2015, p. 537.
  87. ^ Tucker 2009, p. 1210.
  88. ^ Sotiropoulos 2022, p. 180.
  89. ^ a b c d Petrakos 1987, p. 39.
  90. ^ Zachariou 2013, p. 13.
  91. ^ a b Petrakos 2011, p. 13.
  92. ^ a b Petrakos 2011, p. 52.
  93. ^ Tsouli 2020, p. 270.
  94. ^ St. Clair 2022, p. 493.
  95. ^ Pittakis 1858, p. 1711.
  96. ^ Grant 1994, p. 132.
  97. ^ Dyer 1873, p. 351.
  98. ^ Quoted and translated in Papazarkadas 2014, p. 405
  99. ^ a b c Beresford 2016, p. 912.
  100. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 1994, pp. 74–75.
  101. ^ Beresford 2016, pp. 910–911.
  102. ^ a b c d Tsouli 2020, p. 273.
  103. ^ Petrakos 2011, p. 137.
  104. ^ Lambrinou 2016.
  105. ^ Matthiou & Pallis 2021.
  106. ^ Dyson 2008, pp. 74–75.
  107. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 49.
  108. ^ Dumont 2020, p. 241.
  109. ^ a b Van Rookhuijzen 2021, p. 348.
  110. ^ Cohen 2018, p. 95.
  111. ^ Cohen 2018, p. 96.
  112. ^ Jenkins 1990, pp. 91–96.
  113. ^ Plantzos 2014, p. 151.
  114. ^ Plantzos 2008, p. 253.
  115. ^ Hamilakis 2007, p. 115.
  116. ^ Petrakos 2011, p. 60.
  117. ^ Schmalz 2006, p. 72.
  118. ^ a b Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 45.
  119. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, p. 45–46.
  120. ^ Mallouchou-Tufano 2007, pp. 44–46.

Bibliography

  • Arnaoutoglou, Ilias (2008). "διὰ δόξαν ἐκείνων καὶ κλέος του ἔθνους: The Philomousos Society of Athens and Antiquities". The province strikes back: Imperial dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean. Helsinki: Finnish Institute at Athens. pp. 201–214. ISBN 978-951-98806-8-6.
  • Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, Nina (2008). "Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe". Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide. 7 (2). Archived from the original on 17 August 2022. Retrieved 22 December 2022.
  • Baelen, Jean (1958). "La porte Beulé et le prix de poésie de 1854". Bulletin de l'Association Guillaume Budé. 1 (2): 92–116. doi:10.3406/bude.1958.3823. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
  • Beard, Mary (2010). The Parthenon. London: Profile Books. ISBN 978-1-84668-349-7.
  • Beresford, James (2016). "'Alchemy on the Acropolis: Turning ancient lead into restitutionist gold". The Historical Journal. 59 (3): 903–926. doi:10.1017/S0018246X15000242. S2CID 163841256.
  • Buxton Whalley (1851). "A Visit to the 'Maid of Athens'". Bentley's Miscellany. Vol. 30. London. pp. 67–68.
  • Casanaki, Maria; Mallouchou, Fani (1985). "Interventions on the Acropolis: 1833–1975". The Acropolis at Athens: Conservation, Restoration and Research 1975–1983. Athens: ESMA. pp. 12–20.
  • Cohen, Elizabeth (2018). "Explosions and Expulsions in Ottoman Athens: A Heritage Perspective on the Temple of Olympian Zeus". International Journal of Islamic Architecture. 7 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1386/ijia.7.1.85_1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 December 2022. Retrieved 23 December 2022.
  • Constantakopoulou, Christy (2008). "Reviewed Work(s): Ludwig Ross und Griechenland. Akten des Internationalen Kolloquiums, Athen, 2.-3. Oktober 2002 = Ludwig Ross και η Ελλάδα. Πρακτικά του Διεθνούς συνεδρίου, Αθήνα, 2-3 Οκτοβρίου 2002 by H.R. GOETTE and O. PALAGIA". The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 128: 297. doi:10.1017/S0075426900001488. JSTOR 40651866.
  • Coulson, William D.E. (2015) [1996]. "Greek Archaeological Society". In de Grummond, Nancy Thomson (ed.). Encyclopedia of the History of Classical Archaeology. Abingdon: Routledge. pp. 536–537. ISBN 9781134268542.
  • Dickins, Guy (2014) [1912]. Catalogue of the Acropolis Museum: Volume 1, Archaic Sculpture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-41801-1.
  • Dumont, Sylvie (2020). Vrysaki: A Neighborhood Lost in the Search for the Athenian Agora. Athens: American School of Classical Studies at Athens. ISBN 978-1-62139-037-4.
  • Dyer, Thomas Henry (1873). Ancient Athens: its history, topography, and remains. London: Bell and Daldy. OCLC 910991294. Retrieved 23 December 2022.
  • Dyson, Stephen L. (2008). In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-13497-1.
  • Förster, Ludwig (1854). "Reisen in Italien, Griechenland und der Levant". Notizblatt der Allgeimeinen Bauzeitung (in German). Vienna: 21–26. Archived from the original on 20 December 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  • Gabrielsen, Vincent (2014). "The Piraeus and the Athenian Navy: Recent Archaeological and Historical Advances". Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens. 4: 37–48. Archived from the original on 22 December 2022. Retrieved 22 December 2022.
  • Grant, Michael (1994). The Antonines: The Roman Empire in Transition. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis. ISBN 978-1-317-97211-2.
  • Greenberg, Raphael; Hamilakis, Yannis (2022). Archaeology, Nation, and Race: Confronting the Past, Decolonizing the Future in Greece and Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-009-16023-0.
  • Hamilakis, Yannis (2007). The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-923038-9.
  • Hellmann, Marie-Christine; Fraisse, Phillipe; Jacques, Annie (1982). Paris-Rome-Athens: Travels in Greece by French architects in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries [exhibition catalogue]. Houston: University of Texas Press. ISBN 978-0-89090-032-1.
  • Helm, Christoph (2000). "Ludwig Ross und seine Bedeutung für die klassischen Altertumswissenschaften". In Kunze, Max (ed.). Akzidenzen 12: Flugblätter der Winckelmann-Gesellschaft (PDF) (in German). Stendal: Winckelmann-Gesellschaft. pp. 3–24. OCLC 1249640687. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 February 2020. Retrieved 24 December 2022.
  • Iakovidis, Spyridon (2005). "Mycenae: Past Achievements, Present Tasks and Future Prospects". Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. 48: 163–171. doi:10.1111/j.2041-5370.2005.tb00259.x. JSTOR 43646724.
  • Jenkins, Ian (1990). "Acquisition and Supply of Casts of the Parthenon Sculptures by the British Museum, 1835–1939". The Annual of the British School at Athens. 85: 89–114. doi:10.1017/S0068245400015598. JSTOR 30102843. S2CID 193237324.
  • Jenkins, Romilly (1953). "Byron's Maid of Athens: Her Family and Surroundings. By C. G. Brouzas. Pp. 65, 4 pll. Philological Papers (Volume 7), West Virginia University Bulletin, Series 49, No. 12-VI, June, 1949". The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 73: 200. doi:10.2307/628366. JSTOR 628366. S2CID 161447716.
  • Junker, Klaus (1995). "Ludwig Ross und die Publikation seiner Ausgrabungen auf der Athener Akropolis". Archäologischer Anzeiger: 755–762.
  • Lambrinou, Lena (2016). "Ancient Ruins and Their Preservation: The Case Study of the Parthenon's East Porch". In Miles, Margaret (ed.). A Companion to Greek Architecture. Oxford: Wiley. pp. 526–545. ISBN 978-1-4443-3599-6.
  • Lambrinou, Lena (2012). "The Parthenon North Side". In Bouras, Charalambos; Ioannidou, Maria; Jenkins, Ian (eds.). Acropolis Restored. London: The British Museum Press. pp. 49–56. ISBN 978-0-86159-187-9.
  • Mallouchou-Tufano, Fani (2007). "The Vicissitudes of the Athenian Acropolis in the Nineteenth Century: From Castle to Monument". In Vanavalis, Panos (ed.). Great Moments in Greek Archaeology. Athens: Kapon Press. pp. 36–57. ISBN 978-0-89236-910-2.
  • Mallouchou-Tufano, Fani (1998). Η Αναστήλωση των αρχαίων μνημείων στη νεώτερη Ελλάδα (1834–1939) (in Greek). Athens: Archaeological Society of Athens. ISBN 978-960-7036-78-0.
  • Mallouchou-Tufano, Fani (1994). "The History of Interventions on the Acropolis". In Economakis, Richard (ed.). Acropolis Restoration: The CCAM Interventions. Athens: Academy Editions. pp. 69–85. ISBN 978-1-85490-344-0.
  • Matthiou, Angelos; Pallis, Georgios, eds. (2021). Επί πέτρας λευκής. Πρακτικά Συμποσίου εις μνήμην Κυριακού Σ. Πιττάκη (in Greek). Athens: Greek Epigraphical Society. ISBN 978-618-5459-04-8.
  • Merry, Bruce (2004). "Chronicle of Anthimos". Encyclopedia of Modern Greek Literature. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-313-30813-0.
  • Moore, Dudley; Rowlands, Edward; Karadimas, Nektarios (2014). In Search of Agamemnon: Early Travellers to Mycenae. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. ISBN 978-1-4438-5776-5.
  • Neils, Jennifer (2005). The Parthenon: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82093-6.
  • Papadopoulos, Georgios (2021). "Οι έρευνες του Κ. Σ. Πιττάκη στην Σαλαμίνα". In Matthiou, Angelos; Pallis, Georgios (eds.). Επί πέτρας λευκής. Πρακτικά Συμποσίου εις μνήμην Κυριακού Σ. Πιττάκη (in Greek). Athens: Greek Epigraphical Society. pp. 115–132. ISBN 978-618-5459-04-8.
  • Papazarkadas, Nikolaos (2014). "Epigraphy in Early Modern Greece". Journal of the History of Collections. 26 (3): 399–412. doi:10.1093/jhc/fhu018.
  • Petrakos, Vasileios (2011). Η εν Αθήναις Αρχαιολογική Εταιρεία. Οι Αρχαιολόγοι και οι Ανασκαφές 1837–2011 (Κατάλογος Εκθέσεως). Athens: Archaeological Society of Athens. ISBN 978-960-8145-86-3.
  • Petrakos, Vasileios (2007). "The Stages of Greek Archaeology". In Vanavalis, Panos (ed.). Great Moments in Greek Archaeology. Athens: Kapon Press. pp. 16–35. ISBN 978-0-89236-910-2.
  • Petrakos, Vasileios (1987). =Η Εν Αθήναις Αρχαιολογική Εταιρεία: η ιστορία των 150 χρόνων της (in Greek). Athens: Archaeological Society of Athens.
  • Pittakis, Kyriakos (1858). Περὶ Θεάτρου Ἠρώδου τοῦ Ἀττικοῦ (PDF). Αρχαιολογική Εφημερίς (in Greek): 1707–1714. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 December 2022. Retrieved 23 December 2022. {{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 7 January 2022 suggested (help)
  • Pittakis, Kyriakos (1835). L'ancienne Athènes ou la description des antiquités d'Athènes (in French). Athens: M.E. Antoniades. OCLC 10216999.
  • Pizanias, Petros T. (2020). The Making of the Modern Greeks: 1400-1820. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5275-6248-6.
  • Plantzos, Dimitris (2014). "Dead Archaeologists, Buried Gods: Archaeology as an Agent of Modernity in Greece". In Tziovas, Dimitris (ed.). Re-imagining the Past: Antiquity and Modern Greek Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 147–164. ISBN 978-0-19-967275-2.
  • Plantzos, Dimitris (2008). "Time and the Antique: Linear Causality and the Greek Art Narrative". In Damaskos, Dimitris; Plantzos, Dimitris Plantzos (eds.). A Singular Antiquity: Archaeology and Hellenic Identity in Twentieth-Century Greece. Athens: Benaki Museum. pp. 253–272. ISBN 978-960-8347-96-0.
  • Schmalz, Geoffrey (2006). "The Athenian Prytaneion Discovered?". Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. 75 (1): 33–81. doi:10.2972/hesp.75.1.33. JSTOR 25067975. S2CID 162289053.
  • Smith, Lindsay (2020). "Fugitive Stones: The Temple of Athena Nike, Athens in Nineteenth-Century Photographs" (PDF). Nineteenth-Century Contexts. 42 (2): 137–158. doi:10.1080/08905495.2020.1733317. S2CID 214102663. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 June 2022. Retrieved 22 December 2022.
  • Sotiropoulos, Michalis (2022). Liberalism after the Revolution: The Intellectual Foundations of the Greek State, c.1830–1880. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-009-25465-6.
  • St. Clair, William (2022). Who Saved the Parthenon? A New History of the Acropolis Before, During and After the Greek Revolution (PDF). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. doi:10.11647/OBP.0136. ISBN 978-1-78374-461-9. S2CID 248842303. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 7 January 2023.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  • Tomlinson, Richard Allan (2021). "Archaeology". In Speake, Graham (ed.). Encyclopedia of Greece and the Hellenic Tradition. London: Routledge. pp. 119–122. ISBN 978-1-135-94206-9.
  • Tomlinson, Richard Allan (1991). The Athens of Alma Tadema. Stroud: Alan Sutton Publishing. ISBN 978-0-86299-876-9.
  • Tsouli, Chrysanthi (2021). "Panorama of Personalities". National Archaeological Museum of Athens. Archived from the original on 21 December 2022. Retrieved 21 December 2022.
  • Tsouli, Chrysanthi (2020). "Kyriakos Pittakis: sincere patriot, unwearied guard and vigilant Εphor of Αntiquities". In Lagogianni-Georgakarakos, Maria; Koutsogiannis, Thodoris (eds.). These Are What We Fought For: Antiquities and the Greek War of Independence. Athens. pp. 266–275. ISBN 978-960-386-441-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • Tucker, Spencer C. (2009). A Global Chronology of Conflict. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. p. 1210. ISBN 978-1-85109-672-5.
  • Van Rookhuijzen, Janric (2021). "The Turkish Harem in the Karyatid Temple and Antagonistic Narratives on the Athenian Acropolis" (PDF). Opuscula: Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome. 14: 341–362. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2022. Retrieved 21 December 2022. {{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 9 August 2022 suggested (help)
  • Voutsaki, Sofia (2003). "Archaeology and the Construction of the Past in Nineteenth Century Greece". In Hokwerda, Hero (ed.). Constructions of the Greek Past: Identity and Historical Consciousness from Antiquity to the Present. Groningen: Egbert Forsten. pp. 231–255. ISBN 978-90-04-49546-3.
  • Zachariou, Maria (2013). Looking at the Past of Greece through the Eyes of Greeks (PDF) (M.A.). University of Virginia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 November 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2022. {{cite thesis}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 24 October 2021 suggested (help)
Preceded by Ephor-General of Antiquities
1843-1863
Succeeded by