Its a little better than it was yesterday. We still need to clean it up.

Neutrality

This seems to read like promo material. The recognition of rankings from U.S. News and others becomes insipid. Some needs to take the peppiness of this down a notch or two...

Jarfingle 06:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE/REVERSE THIS THIS PAGE WITHOUT DISCUSSION

This version seems better than previous version

Disagree!

Baruch is underrated. The Largest Business School in America can't have such a small niche on wiki Other Colleges have posted their Rankings..Baruch should be given an equal chance to Please try to edit the information posted rather than remove it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.80.158.200 (talk) 10:13, 18 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I agree that Baruch is underrated=

I heard its a great business college for the bucks. This college should get same chance as other colleges.

Large scale reversion

The large scale reversion was needed, as the copyright problems with this article were very severe. The first copyright violation was this September 2005 edit, which took material from About the Zicklin School of Business, some of which was still there in the version I dealt with. Andjam 12:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 12, 2007 vandalism to the Wikipedia Polynomial article: Listing "yeskl;jlfjdsljhflkahshfiwohfdkls;FHODS" under the SEE ALSO section! Larry R. Holmgren 01:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

It was ripped...

"Our College..."

College pages need an overall policy. I imagine most college wiki articles have this type of promo copy in them. This copy is not helpful to the reader.